THANK YOU for covering this data! They fear exposure more than anything else. And shining a light on their deeds must remain a top priority until they are unable to mislead another single person.
You are doing the most imperative work possible right now. Godspeed!
"We expect to generate approximately 90 percent of our full-year revenues in the final months of 2024, primarily in the fourth quarter of 2024," said Jens Holstein, Biontech's Chief Financial Officer."
Is there a way to do a simple comparison - the "average" set of deathvax reports (say using the V-safe categories of SAEs), vs the "throttled", age-covered-up, or "deleted" average deathvax report?
In other words, are the throttled/deleted reports (on average) more severe than the normal group?
That would seem to be a "smocking" gun, if (say) "deaths" happened five times as often in the throttled/mis-aged/deleted groups.
Yes that would be easy to do. Vsafe aside because you can't really see throttling going on there because it seems to be activated by submitter, and there is only one entry date as opposed to two dates (submission & published date). Anybody can do this analysis using the dashboard choosing x days after submission date. The query would be, "show me all covid reports with received/publish date say 180days<. Then sync the proportionate percentage ratios to the event levels. I'll put that potential article on my honey do list...
You have all this insight about how they throttle and scam us; I was just trying to come up with a way of presenting what you know so that the rest of us could see just how bad it is too. I picked V-safe because they had a small number of SAE categories. Maybe - just pick "death" instead? As in:
Line 1: % of VAERS reports - properly reported - that end in death
Line 2: % of VAERS reports - throttled - that end in death.
Line 3: % of VAERS reports - mis-aged - that end in death.
Line 4: % of VAERS reports - VAX-UNKNOWN - that end in death.
And maybe others I haven't thought of. Call it the shimmy-sham (or cover-up) panel?
The question: are they trying to hide deaths? I suspect yes, but - just how bad is it?
THANK YOU for covering this data! They fear exposure more than anything else. And shining a light on their deeds must remain a top priority until they are unable to mislead another single person.
You are doing the most imperative work possible right now. Godspeed!
Wow.
"We expect to generate approximately 90 percent of our full-year revenues in the final months of 2024, primarily in the fourth quarter of 2024," said Jens Holstein, Biontech's Chief Financial Officer."
https://www.msn.com/de-de/finanzen/top-stories/biontech-macht-millionenverlust-pharmakonzern-braucht-neue-medikamente/ar-BB1lU3ah?ocid=chromentp
DR SABINE STEBEL
https://t.me/DrBines_verbales_Vitriol/6381
Great work once again! Thank you so much!
Is there a way to do a simple comparison - the "average" set of deathvax reports (say using the V-safe categories of SAEs), vs the "throttled", age-covered-up, or "deleted" average deathvax report?
In other words, are the throttled/deleted reports (on average) more severe than the normal group?
That would seem to be a "smocking" gun, if (say) "deaths" happened five times as often in the throttled/mis-aged/deleted groups.
Yes that would be easy to do. Vsafe aside because you can't really see throttling going on there because it seems to be activated by submitter, and there is only one entry date as opposed to two dates (submission & published date). Anybody can do this analysis using the dashboard choosing x days after submission date. The query would be, "show me all covid reports with received/publish date say 180days<. Then sync the proportionate percentage ratios to the event levels. I'll put that potential article on my honey do list...
You have all this insight about how they throttle and scam us; I was just trying to come up with a way of presenting what you know so that the rest of us could see just how bad it is too. I picked V-safe because they had a small number of SAE categories. Maybe - just pick "death" instead? As in:
Line 1: % of VAERS reports - properly reported - that end in death
Line 2: % of VAERS reports - throttled - that end in death.
Line 3: % of VAERS reports - mis-aged - that end in death.
Line 4: % of VAERS reports - VAX-UNKNOWN - that end in death.
And maybe others I haven't thought of. Call it the shimmy-sham (or cover-up) panel?
The question: are they trying to hide deaths? I suspect yes, but - just how bad is it?