I believe you are doing valuable work. These surveillance systems should be open, simple, robust and auditable enough to give people 100% confidence that there is zero unexplained data manipulation.
Certainly this piecemeal tinkering with the data is not going to help humanity in the end.
I have a suggestion that you could put out into the world, you have more followers than me and if you get your wider 'team' of data sleuths to spread the idea it might find the right fertile soil and bloom quickly.
I propose that you or anyone really who has familiarity with the in house systems in hospitals, insurers, billing and VSD/VAERS/etc. databases would write up some SQL (or whatever) queries that would highlight the most OBVIOUS red flags.
Like there has been talk that 'sudden onset autism' (or any other condition) is more common after a 'well baby'/vaccine visit with a doctor. This should be visible in the ICD or billing data. What if SIDS is always closer to a recent instead of a future jab. Same could be done for SADS I suppose but there is less of it.
Studies have been done to see if vaccines are more harmful to preterm babies and this may be due to dose/kg as a first effect and then the more serious connection to immune system readiness to insult as a function of age.
If there was a 'cheat sheet' of queries that was published (or at least mentioned) 'simultaneously' by all the health freedom players that would give the workers at these data bases the skill to make the query, especially those who are specifically 'allowed' to interrogate the data for maintenance and data integrity reasons without exporting any data but still able to look at results. They could see if there are any big red flags in the data and blow some whistles and instigate formal academic studies of those data sets that might be subpoenable in some countries.
I other words, what study could be done on closed (or hard to access) data sets that would prove things one way or the other and how could they be queried as simply as possible.
I wish there was some smoking gun results out there that could not be brushed under the carpet all the time.
I appreciate your comment and I believe we are reinventing the wheel on a "database" or software to interrogate the data. In the private sector where mistakes equal missed reimbursements and fraud actually gets punished, enterprise level billing and analysis and auditing software already exists. That's the EPIC or GE Centricity software I referred to. We call the whole system a RCM (Revenue Cycle Management) Suite. Front Office gets visibility to almost everything including billing info, back office and physicians get full access, billing and management get full access, then upper management gets auditing level access with a host of analytics tools where they can customize reports to their satisfaction.
Maybe I offend a certain segment by calling them PhD dump & pumpers. They are used to working on pristine data I guess can great some top level analysis based on probabilities. That's great, but someone will gain an edge if they have expertise in RCM in the medical field. If MAHA was wise, they would call on me. It would be a dream of mine. However, until then I have plenty of PhD dump & pumpers reading my mail. I guess I'm like the canary in the coal mine. I wish I had the luxury of having someone like myself giving me a heads up and clues where to look, what to look for, and almost how to do it. I have faith that it will come full circle and people will recognize that my work was and is critical. I'm sure CDC/FDA is doing what I'm doing but internally for themselves. I'm not creating or inventing something. I'm just making it better. Maybe CHD, Highwire, VSRF will get wise and hire somebody to study my stuff and duplicate their own auditing system and slap their logo on it? That's how this cut throat world works. Alas if they could put it behind a paywall it would have already been done! I could do that now and probably find a thousand people around the world to pay $10/mn. I've always consider my dashboard a beta version because I know there are many real Tableau experts out there, there just needs to be that special person that's expert in RCM, medical billing, VAERS, Pharmacovigilance that can put all the pieces together and have the resources to do it. I have everything but the resources. It's frustrating. I never started this for the money. God Bless.
You wrote "and fraud actually gets punished" but for some reason it does not. I accept that the word fraud is misapplied here because a negative outcome for the management is lower returns while for humanity it is higher harms.
I understand your frustration and not having access to those high up the power hierarchy to share what you see. They would gain more than you if they were looking for the truth and that is a puzzle for me as well.
You paraphrased my hope perfectly "I wish I had the luxury of having someone like myself giving me a heads up and clues where to look, what to look for, and almost how to do it." and this is exactly what I hope for someone with access too. If the cheat sheet works you may be called on to draft more queries.
The situation is that those who know there is cover up are benefiting from the cover up and have no skin in the game to expose the cover up.
I would love for all those who are not "upper management gets auditing level access with a host of analytics tools where they can customize reports to their satisfaction." and complicit in the coverup to be emboldened to make a query that is most likely to return a signal to know what to ask from the system.
There are 5-7 studies that have compared vaccinated vs. unvaccinated (children) on outcomes using various datasets that show harm from vaccines. Even formulating and formatting these same studies to just extract the main points from more datasets might find one that has a strong signal. Once there is even just one UNCONTROVERSIAL signal it would get the ball rolling and in the right direction. The boulder of evidence has been moving to the top of the hill for some time now and I would love to see it get rolling on the correct side.
Try to approach Dr. Aseem Malhotra, he is a rational fellow (I met him briefly in Finland) and he is interested in covid vax harms and has secured an advisory role to the USA HHS, you could also try JB Handley, who wrote recently (link below) about the studies showing better outcomes for unvaccinated (children) and Meryl Nass who is in favour of science (link below) and David Geier who has been digging into data for a long time and might need an assistant/coder and may be given access to data via RFK Jr. now who you could also try and contact perhaps via Aseem.
I do wish you the best and hope a suitable partner can be found and some dataset operators are enabled to check the obvious correlations.
Thank you for your vigilance, Albert. My husband, before his sudden untimely death in Dec 2023, downloaded the death data from the CDC each and every week from 2020 on. The amount of shenanigans he saw during his time doing so was astounding - using CDC's own death data only. He shared a few of his graphs on FB, and a few friends saw it. I wonder if anyone else is continuing to do so, or if we are avoiding the circus altogether knowing it's a show anyway.
But the problem is that every number is a life, not just a number. And it's not just his/her life, but the lives of all those around them who are affected by that death. We are a traumatized people, which makes it harder for us to think clearly. I thank you again for continuing to reveal the show to all who have eyes to see and ears to hear. May God bless you and your family.
Thank you for your relentless work, Albert!
I sincerely apologize for rarely even stopping by to like or comment but I read and share your work and from the bottom of my heart, thank you.
I believe you are doing valuable work. These surveillance systems should be open, simple, robust and auditable enough to give people 100% confidence that there is zero unexplained data manipulation.
Certainly this piecemeal tinkering with the data is not going to help humanity in the end.
I have a suggestion that you could put out into the world, you have more followers than me and if you get your wider 'team' of data sleuths to spread the idea it might find the right fertile soil and bloom quickly.
I propose that you or anyone really who has familiarity with the in house systems in hospitals, insurers, billing and VSD/VAERS/etc. databases would write up some SQL (or whatever) queries that would highlight the most OBVIOUS red flags.
Like there has been talk that 'sudden onset autism' (or any other condition) is more common after a 'well baby'/vaccine visit with a doctor. This should be visible in the ICD or billing data. What if SIDS is always closer to a recent instead of a future jab. Same could be done for SADS I suppose but there is less of it.
Studies have been done to see if vaccines are more harmful to preterm babies and this may be due to dose/kg as a first effect and then the more serious connection to immune system readiness to insult as a function of age.
If there was a 'cheat sheet' of queries that was published (or at least mentioned) 'simultaneously' by all the health freedom players that would give the workers at these data bases the skill to make the query, especially those who are specifically 'allowed' to interrogate the data for maintenance and data integrity reasons without exporting any data but still able to look at results. They could see if there are any big red flags in the data and blow some whistles and instigate formal academic studies of those data sets that might be subpoenable in some countries.
I other words, what study could be done on closed (or hard to access) data sets that would prove things one way or the other and how could they be queried as simply as possible.
I wish there was some smoking gun results out there that could not be brushed under the carpet all the time.
Thank you for your service.
I appreciate your comment and I believe we are reinventing the wheel on a "database" or software to interrogate the data. In the private sector where mistakes equal missed reimbursements and fraud actually gets punished, enterprise level billing and analysis and auditing software already exists. That's the EPIC or GE Centricity software I referred to. We call the whole system a RCM (Revenue Cycle Management) Suite. Front Office gets visibility to almost everything including billing info, back office and physicians get full access, billing and management get full access, then upper management gets auditing level access with a host of analytics tools where they can customize reports to their satisfaction.
Maybe I offend a certain segment by calling them PhD dump & pumpers. They are used to working on pristine data I guess can great some top level analysis based on probabilities. That's great, but someone will gain an edge if they have expertise in RCM in the medical field. If MAHA was wise, they would call on me. It would be a dream of mine. However, until then I have plenty of PhD dump & pumpers reading my mail. I guess I'm like the canary in the coal mine. I wish I had the luxury of having someone like myself giving me a heads up and clues where to look, what to look for, and almost how to do it. I have faith that it will come full circle and people will recognize that my work was and is critical. I'm sure CDC/FDA is doing what I'm doing but internally for themselves. I'm not creating or inventing something. I'm just making it better. Maybe CHD, Highwire, VSRF will get wise and hire somebody to study my stuff and duplicate their own auditing system and slap their logo on it? That's how this cut throat world works. Alas if they could put it behind a paywall it would have already been done! I could do that now and probably find a thousand people around the world to pay $10/mn. I've always consider my dashboard a beta version because I know there are many real Tableau experts out there, there just needs to be that special person that's expert in RCM, medical billing, VAERS, Pharmacovigilance that can put all the pieces together and have the resources to do it. I have everything but the resources. It's frustrating. I never started this for the money. God Bless.
Thank you for the detailed response.
You wrote "and fraud actually gets punished" but for some reason it does not. I accept that the word fraud is misapplied here because a negative outcome for the management is lower returns while for humanity it is higher harms.
I understand your frustration and not having access to those high up the power hierarchy to share what you see. They would gain more than you if they were looking for the truth and that is a puzzle for me as well.
You paraphrased my hope perfectly "I wish I had the luxury of having someone like myself giving me a heads up and clues where to look, what to look for, and almost how to do it." and this is exactly what I hope for someone with access too. If the cheat sheet works you may be called on to draft more queries.
The situation is that those who know there is cover up are benefiting from the cover up and have no skin in the game to expose the cover up.
I would love for all those who are not "upper management gets auditing level access with a host of analytics tools where they can customize reports to their satisfaction." and complicit in the coverup to be emboldened to make a query that is most likely to return a signal to know what to ask from the system.
There are 5-7 studies that have compared vaccinated vs. unvaccinated (children) on outcomes using various datasets that show harm from vaccines. Even formulating and formatting these same studies to just extract the main points from more datasets might find one that has a strong signal. Once there is even just one UNCONTROVERSIAL signal it would get the ball rolling and in the right direction. The boulder of evidence has been moving to the top of the hill for some time now and I would love to see it get rolling on the correct side.
Try to approach Dr. Aseem Malhotra, he is a rational fellow (I met him briefly in Finland) and he is interested in covid vax harms and has secured an advisory role to the USA HHS, you could also try JB Handley, who wrote recently (link below) about the studies showing better outcomes for unvaccinated (children) and Meryl Nass who is in favour of science (link below) and David Geier who has been digging into data for a long time and might need an assistant/coder and may be given access to data via RFK Jr. now who you could also try and contact perhaps via Aseem.
I do wish you the best and hope a suitable partner can be found and some dataset operators are enabled to check the obvious correlations.
https://jbhandley.substack.com/p/studies-of-unvaccinated-american
https://merylnass.substack.com/p/wsj-misrepresents-the-history-and
My injuries never made the list.
Government pretty much already killed me electronically.
Makes you wonder if they will be pulling people's Plugs during the Staged Civil War?
Thank you for your vigilance, Albert. My husband, before his sudden untimely death in Dec 2023, downloaded the death data from the CDC each and every week from 2020 on. The amount of shenanigans he saw during his time doing so was astounding - using CDC's own death data only. He shared a few of his graphs on FB, and a few friends saw it. I wonder if anyone else is continuing to do so, or if we are avoiding the circus altogether knowing it's a show anyway.
But the problem is that every number is a life, not just a number. And it's not just his/her life, but the lives of all those around them who are affected by that death. We are a traumatized people, which makes it harder for us to think clearly. I thank you again for continuing to reveal the show to all who have eyes to see and ears to hear. May God bless you and your family.
My condolences to you. I'd be happy to look at your husband's graphs, and any other parts of his legacy on this kind of tracking.
We need to call for metadata records, explaining exactly why things get removed or put back in.
Can you look into VAERS ID: 0574458? As with this example, I'm finding duplicate symptoms for a given VAERS ID. Can you explain that to me?