It's bad enough that my 56-year-old daughter died of renal cell carcinoma from 1 Pfizer shot an 1 Moderna shot four months and one week after she had taken the second shot, but to have submitted the VAERS report, and knowing that it had been accepted and then not being able to find it in the VAERS records is too much to tolerate. Where is my daughter's death acknowledged in this? And how many other deaths from cancer are missing from this record? Maybe they are alluding in the number of hospital visits she had to make there in Worcester, Massachusetts.
If you give me as much detail as possible, I'd can do a "deep" search to see if your VAERS reports exists (or ever existed). I can look at the deleted reports (after publication) as well.
welcometheeagle88@protonmail.com. There is a good possibility report was submitted before death and therefore could be classified at any level, ie: ER, hospital, life threatening, etc...
The report was not submitted before her death. VAERS acknowledged my report in writing via Email including the report's number But then it vanished without a trace. As her mother living in another country, I didn't have the numbers associated with the COVID-19 shots that she had so I could not write them on the report. But I wrote the date of her death, her full name, DOB, address where she last lived if that was requested on the VAERS report.
Have you ever hit a curb it other object and damaged the sidewall of your tire, or seen one that was damaged as such? The sidewall may be cut, bulging, bubbled out. What you can see is the damage inside to the structural cords. If the tire still holds air, you can take your chances and continue to drive on it. If the tire is internally damaged, it'll be out of round to some degree and the tire will shimmy and bounce going down the road. To what degree depends on the damage. If tire springs an air leak and loses air, you'll might be able to refill it one or more times to make it home. The real danger is the damage tire going flat and coming apart at speed, and causing you to lose control and crash. So instead of taking chances and driving on a tire with myocarditis, you could just put on the spare, drive to the tire shop and buy a replacement tire, because sidewall damage cannot be fixed, unlike a puncture through the tread. Obviously, it's not possible to do the same for a damaged heart.
Everyone who has been vaxed should be screened for damage to the heart, because the Vax absolutely can and does damage the heart, just as hitting a curb can and does damage a tire. To what degree is highly variable. Emergency rooms began testing every single patient in 2021 for heart damage, and defibrillators were installed in every government institution, from schools to city hall. So they knew. And played stupid or flat out denied the Vax damaged the heart. (And all the other organs). But that's it. They did tell general practitioners to screen patients for hidden heart damage .
The vaxed are not more succeptible to a virus and catching Covid over & over post Vax & booster. They've been poisoned, and their cells, tissues and organs have been damaged to varying degrees. All their tires including the spare have hit a curb, and they're driving around as if all is well.
There is also significant underreporting in Germany. This underreporting begins with the inclusion in the list of vaccine-related adverse events. At the Paul Ehrlich Institute, responsible for recording and evaluating such events, only 19 employees in the Pharmacovigilance Department were designated to assess adverse events caused by traditional vaccines (about 22 million to 30 million vaccinations per year) until 2020. In 2021–2022, approximately 150 million additional COVID-19 vaccinations were administered. However, the workforce of qualified staff trained to classify and assess vaccine-related adverse events was only marginally increased.
If one were to assume the same rate of adverse effects for a newly developed, fast-tracked vaccine as for traditional vaccines, the high volume of vaccinations would have necessitated a fivefold increase in staff—an additional 85 employees. Given the expectation of a higher and more frequent rate of vaccine-related side effects, it would have been imperative for policy authorities (Ministry of Health) to mandate an expansion of the PEI's personnel. As it stands, this lack of staffing has left the PEI effectively "flying blind"; many reported adverse effects, potentially still awaiting processing, may not have been adequately assessed due to the institute's limited staffing capacity.
I asked AI what she things about these facts. The answer is:
"The consequence of the last paragraph is that the inadequate increase in staffing at the Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI) poses a risk that reported vaccine-related adverse events may not be fully or promptly recorded and assessed. This could result in potentially serious or frequently occurring side effects remaining undetected or being recognized too late, which could jeopardize the safety of the vaccinated population. This means that without sufficient resources to monitor and evaluate adverse effects, a reliable assessment of vaccine safety may not be ensured. This could lead to a loss of trust in the healthcare system and complicate decision-making for political measures that rely on a comprehensive understanding of vaccine risks."
Is there a subset of vaers reports of people that have had multiple adverse events for multiple jabs? With a safe and effective product that should almost never happen by chance I expect?
It's bad enough that my 56-year-old daughter died of renal cell carcinoma from 1 Pfizer shot an 1 Moderna shot four months and one week after she had taken the second shot, but to have submitted the VAERS report, and knowing that it had been accepted and then not being able to find it in the VAERS records is too much to tolerate. Where is my daughter's death acknowledged in this? And how many other deaths from cancer are missing from this record? Maybe they are alluding in the number of hospital visits she had to make there in Worcester, Massachusetts.
If you give me as much detail as possible, I'd can do a "deep" search to see if your VAERS reports exists (or ever existed). I can look at the deleted reports (after publication) as well.
welcometheeagle88@protonmail.com. There is a good possibility report was submitted before death and therefore could be classified at any level, ie: ER, hospital, life threatening, etc...
The report was not submitted before her death. VAERS acknowledged my report in writing via Email including the report's number But then it vanished without a trace. As her mother living in another country, I didn't have the numbers associated with the COVID-19 shots that she had so I could not write them on the report. But I wrote the date of her death, her full name, DOB, address where she last lived if that was requested on the VAERS report.
Have you ever hit a curb it other object and damaged the sidewall of your tire, or seen one that was damaged as such? The sidewall may be cut, bulging, bubbled out. What you can see is the damage inside to the structural cords. If the tire still holds air, you can take your chances and continue to drive on it. If the tire is internally damaged, it'll be out of round to some degree and the tire will shimmy and bounce going down the road. To what degree depends on the damage. If tire springs an air leak and loses air, you'll might be able to refill it one or more times to make it home. The real danger is the damage tire going flat and coming apart at speed, and causing you to lose control and crash. So instead of taking chances and driving on a tire with myocarditis, you could just put on the spare, drive to the tire shop and buy a replacement tire, because sidewall damage cannot be fixed, unlike a puncture through the tread. Obviously, it's not possible to do the same for a damaged heart.
Everyone who has been vaxed should be screened for damage to the heart, because the Vax absolutely can and does damage the heart, just as hitting a curb can and does damage a tire. To what degree is highly variable. Emergency rooms began testing every single patient in 2021 for heart damage, and defibrillators were installed in every government institution, from schools to city hall. So they knew. And played stupid or flat out denied the Vax damaged the heart. (And all the other organs). But that's it. They did tell general practitioners to screen patients for hidden heart damage .
The vaxed are not more succeptible to a virus and catching Covid over & over post Vax & booster. They've been poisoned, and their cells, tissues and organs have been damaged to varying degrees. All their tires including the spare have hit a curb, and they're driving around as if all is well.
There is also significant underreporting in Germany. This underreporting begins with the inclusion in the list of vaccine-related adverse events. At the Paul Ehrlich Institute, responsible for recording and evaluating such events, only 19 employees in the Pharmacovigilance Department were designated to assess adverse events caused by traditional vaccines (about 22 million to 30 million vaccinations per year) until 2020. In 2021–2022, approximately 150 million additional COVID-19 vaccinations were administered. However, the workforce of qualified staff trained to classify and assess vaccine-related adverse events was only marginally increased.
If one were to assume the same rate of adverse effects for a newly developed, fast-tracked vaccine as for traditional vaccines, the high volume of vaccinations would have necessitated a fivefold increase in staff—an additional 85 employees. Given the expectation of a higher and more frequent rate of vaccine-related side effects, it would have been imperative for policy authorities (Ministry of Health) to mandate an expansion of the PEI's personnel. As it stands, this lack of staffing has left the PEI effectively "flying blind"; many reported adverse effects, potentially still awaiting processing, may not have been adequately assessed due to the institute's limited staffing capacity.
I asked AI what she things about these facts. The answer is:
"The consequence of the last paragraph is that the inadequate increase in staffing at the Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI) poses a risk that reported vaccine-related adverse events may not be fully or promptly recorded and assessed. This could result in potentially serious or frequently occurring side effects remaining undetected or being recognized too late, which could jeopardize the safety of the vaccinated population. This means that without sufficient resources to monitor and evaluate adverse effects, a reliable assessment of vaccine safety may not be ensured. This could lead to a loss of trust in the healthcare system and complicate decision-making for political measures that rely on a comprehensive understanding of vaccine risks."
Thank you for your service.
Is there a subset of vaers reports of people that have had multiple adverse events for multiple jabs? With a safe and effective product that should almost never happen by chance I expect?