Back when Reagan made that fatal mistake, the idea vaccines would become mandatory was not yet rearing it's ugly head, and the NCVIA was billed as a fast resolution, purported to "save" people years in court. Barbara pushed the NCVIA on pretense that it would help make vaccines "safer" if it was passed because it contains a couple of assurances that the U.S. government would take extra care to monitor safety. Every single one of the clauses requiring the government to do so has been violated.
Once we lost any pretense of the "free market" regulating vaccines (naturally, due to liability, and LACK of mandates) the monster got out of control. Every single time we turn to government to regulate ANYTHING it turns to complete SHIT. Collectivism/communism (i.e., "public" heath) and fascism (government partnering with big biz) ALWAYS leads to pure shit, and ultimately, the fall of Nations.
But then, the fall of the American Republic is a prerequisite to the installation of the NWO and full enslavement of humanity globally. Right now however, thanks to the BRICS nations, the WEF's NWO dreams are far out of reach. And yet, they're sticking to their plans by physically slaughtering the goose that what always the only source of their power. No matter how detrimental to their own (sick) interests, they press on with the destruction of America.
It makes Jim Carrey's character in Dumb & Dumber look smart.
I have known Barbara loe fisher for 25 years and she doesn’t deserve this type of attack. She doesn’t deserve any attack. What is so terrible about saying you favor safe vaccines? Don’t you favor safe drugs? Don’t you favor safe supplements? As a medical practitioner for over 40 years, tens of thousands of patients came to me seeking solutions and sometimes those solutions required safe drugs, or safe vaccines. Don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater.
I don’t think I’m attacking, at least that’s not my intent. Pro vax is pro vax, I would like to know which vax is generally safe? I don’t subscribe to a flu vax because I don’t think it’s worth it. Comparing vitamins to vaccines? Even now I’m watching out for vitamins as they don’t seem all to me made the same, but vaccines are completely different IMO. Drugs is a big umbrella, as there is a bunch of garbage in existence and FDA approved. On principle alone since this COVID era, I would never take another vaccine (if I was pro vax). All trust in that industry should be lost. I say beware of anybody who wants to improve the formula. I’ve been in corporate medicine myself for 25 years and I fired six doctors in one day once, so no need to authenticate yourself to me. I know who you are. But thanks for your concern for me. I think all vaccines should be stopped, but I’ll be kind and say they should be paused. Can you tell Bobby we should have a real VAERS with interactive dashboards and ethical data cleansing. Like find properly documented ages in the summary and populating the age field. Same thing for death dates, etc. Even Bobby knows VAERS doesn’t publish all legitimate reports received! You know that right? How about deleting legitimate reports, meaning not duplicate or false. How about the throttling aka purposeful delay in publishing reports? Do you not think VAERS doesn’t run cover for big pharma? Give me a chance to show you, anytime. Michael Baum was using my Deleted Reports dashboard for the MERCK HPV class action, I gave him and his team a carpet ride a long time ago. I’ve linked every deleted report within a interactive dashboard as far back as Medalerts goes. Catch things like the dead Pfizer trial victim that was deleted. I’m also Beaudoin’s canary on the fence catching any deaths from the states he’s looking for within the time frames he wants. My selective perception is vaccines are no good. Everybody is allowed to have an opinion. Oh there is about ~12 trial victims deleted from VAERS, they just didn’t die, at least not on initial report. Maybe they are now since dead who knows? God Bless.
I agree. While I admit there theoretically could be a good vax, in reality it would need to be against something with a fatality rate well above 10% in younger folk, and have a strong track record of not only saving lives but showing almost no long term effects, while being monitored by extremely skeptical people. Maybe people who have lost loved ones to bad vaccines.
We're about to be told there's a new "bug" with a higher than 10% fatality rate. What they WON'T mention, is that the unvaccinated aren't dying from "it." And the REASON this will be the case, is that it's the LAST vaccines causing the new "epidemic" which they INTEND to blame on a new "bug."
Look for an announcement that there's a new "strain" of HIV (or similar) which is MUCH deadlier and far more contagious. This seems the most likely way they will blame the complete destruction of the human immune system (via the vaccines) on something ELSE (a "bug" for which vaccines MUST be mandated, due to the high fatality rate).
Did you not know that the PCR test was proven to produce a 97% false positives? Did you not know that the CDC admitted that 94% of all so-called "covid" deaths carried an average of 2.6% co-morbidities, INCLUDING things like bullet wounds to the head? FWI: Comorbidity means something ELSE that kills the person.
In what world do you think we can trust government to force-inject all of us at their whim? Do you think we can trust ANYTHING they have to say to us about WHY we must all be injected? Do you think that these lying, murderous slags will magically start telling us the truth? If their products were "safe" (or ever could be) they wouldn't NEED to mandate them.
The primary reason many people don't want to be injected is because we KNOW these drugs are incredibly UNSAFE and that they don't actually protect us from ANYTHING.
You're writing things which make it appear you think you're addressing 4 year-old retards who cannot think, and who know NOTHING about what's going on right now in this arena. But this is NOT the audience for your defense of vaccines and those who continue pushing for them, but just "safer" ones.
And in all honesty, if Trump doesn’t do a Mia culpa I’ll vote for Bobby. If a candidate checks my 99 boxes but doesn’t check my number #1 box then I can’t vote for that person on principle. Bobby would at least be better for the future of vaccines IMO.
The idea that we could somehow trust that ANY drugs are "safe" (cuz government says so) is what keeps the vaccine mandate door wide OPEN for all of us and our children.
ALL vaccines have been formally classified ALL vaccines as "unavoidably unsafe." SEE Restatement (2nd) of Torts § 402A, comment K.
So the NEXT time the government and pharma assure you the "new" vaccine is "safer" or "safe" are you THEN going to be okay with mandates and ZERO liability for damage and deaths? There is only ONE reason to eliminate liability for the makers, and this is that their products are DESTRUCTIVE. We do NOT need vaccines. We need safety FROM them.
Generally, I would vote for anyone I could agree with perhaps 80% of the time. But in present times, medical freedom is everything. Because if ANY person (eg: government) can force us to put anything in our bodies, we ARE slaves. Nay, worse than slaves.
I agree that being free of government intrusion (injection;-) into our bodies is the imperative, because lower taxes and secure borders are worth nothing to a DEAD person. Sadly, Bobby supports the climate hoax, the "final solution" for which is the extermination of almost all of humanity. It's a strange religion that makes it odd Bobby would actually be interested in "saving lives." And under the Agenda of the WEF climate hoaxers, they kill us via "any means necessary" which includes starvation, along with abolishing the right to own anything, even our own labor.
Right now, the field of options for U.S. President looks like it leads to the extermination agenda no matter which road we take. The WEF owns all horses in the race.
Does RFK, Jr. REALLY believe in the climate hoax? To be honest, I don't follow him closely (except for his interviews on vaccines), so I don't know the extent to which he is married to the "climate change is due to human activities" notion.
I was shocked to see him pushing Gretta Thunberg on Twitter a couple of years back. He is very "passionate" about supporting the climate hoax, carbon tax, Agenda 21/30, etc. So justification for slaughtering most of humanity is there, he just advocates for doing it via other means I guess. And he is only talking about "restoring trust" by "reforming" the existing agencies (they should admit their "mistakes" so we will "trust" them again). NONE of this was a mistake. He of all people knows this. So his position that any of this is forgivable or acceptable if the perps will just admit they made mistakes, is quite odd to me.
It's interesting to see him expose as much as he does, and then arguing only for "safer" vaccines, (that WOULD be okay to mandate in his mind?) and "forgiveness" (pardon) for all of the perps. The "all of this was just a series of innocent mistakes" tour is worse for medical freedom than if he'd just stayed out of the battle.
What's the point of having or striving for safe drugs, or more to the point safe snakeoils when they are not required in the first place? They DON'T work. In a lot of cases these days the drugs are attempting to 'mend' the damage caused from the jabs!!
It's amazing that any of my generation (early 60s) are still alive having only had 3 jabs. My son and daughter (late 80s) had around 18, and my lovely granddaughters (2015 and 2017) will probably have 50 before they are in their teens (my numbers might not be 100% correct, but the trend is). Loading the coffers of Big Pharma, and the trickle down to their snakeoil administration 'agents' ie GPs is the only reason I can see for my family 3:18:50 ratio I have seen. It's certainly got NOTHING to do with health. It's also why Germ Theory is still a theory well over a century after the likes of that clown Pasteur loaded their garbage on the world.
I am a qualified Chemist with over 25 years experience in analytical chemistry involving method development and method validation. I blindly followed the set out vax program for my 2 children because I trusted the authorities. In Jan 2020 I stumbled across the Drosden PCR test and the rapid adoption of it by the corrupt to the core WHO. A test method NEVER validated, and it was this that sent me down the rabbit hole of medicine. I am currently doing a degree in Epidemiology, Immunology and Human Sciences along side my other research, which includes the history of medicine, to look at both sides. Quite frankly I am disgusted at the morals of so called 'professionals' and their 'governing' bodies. In fact the morals start and end with their pay cheques. I know this is rife throughout the world in other sectors, but I always imagined/hoped the 'Do no harm' principle was set in stone. How wrong I was.
ALL vaccines are destructive and do far more HARM that any of their hypothetical claims of benefit. Your idea that there is some way to "cleanse" these inherently DESTRUCTIVE injections (which are directly responsible well over 90% of the deadly and disabling diseases suffered by Americans today) and throw out the bathwater ONLY, is misguided.
It is the very act of injecting foreign proteins into the body that causes immune system dysfunction. In NO WORLD can it ever be "safe" to inject foreign proteins directly into the body. And the entire theory of a vaccinology is premised upon injecting foreign proteins into the body. The FDA & pharma tell us to go on eating TRASH foods, and the FDA (who works for pharma) is presently attempting to criminalize the use of vitamin C, D, etc.
This freak show of show-called "health" experts want only ONE thing, and this is DEPOPULATION. Go ahead and "trust" them the next time they assure you their drugs are "safe." They are not only extremely destructive, there is ZERO possible benefit to any of this madness. You don't get health, (or "immunity") from a drug. If you're in poor health (either from toxins or malnutrition) you're going to get sick, no matter how many injections you take.
And pharma will blame your illness on a virus or bacteria, AND a lack of vaccines. But the virus/bacteria show up AFTER the fact, the same way maggots show up AFTER an animal dies. Just because you found maggots at the "scene of the crime" doesn't mean the maggots killed the animal.
Oxymoron: "Safe Vaccines"
Back when Reagan made that fatal mistake, the idea vaccines would become mandatory was not yet rearing it's ugly head, and the NCVIA was billed as a fast resolution, purported to "save" people years in court. Barbara pushed the NCVIA on pretense that it would help make vaccines "safer" if it was passed because it contains a couple of assurances that the U.S. government would take extra care to monitor safety. Every single one of the clauses requiring the government to do so has been violated.
Once we lost any pretense of the "free market" regulating vaccines (naturally, due to liability, and LACK of mandates) the monster got out of control. Every single time we turn to government to regulate ANYTHING it turns to complete SHIT. Collectivism/communism (i.e., "public" heath) and fascism (government partnering with big biz) ALWAYS leads to pure shit, and ultimately, the fall of Nations.
But then, the fall of the American Republic is a prerequisite to the installation of the NWO and full enslavement of humanity globally. Right now however, thanks to the BRICS nations, the WEF's NWO dreams are far out of reach. And yet, they're sticking to their plans by physically slaughtering the goose that what always the only source of their power. No matter how detrimental to their own (sick) interests, they press on with the destruction of America.
It makes Jim Carrey's character in Dumb & Dumber look smart.
I have known Barbara loe fisher for 25 years and she doesn’t deserve this type of attack. She doesn’t deserve any attack. What is so terrible about saying you favor safe vaccines? Don’t you favor safe drugs? Don’t you favor safe supplements? As a medical practitioner for over 40 years, tens of thousands of patients came to me seeking solutions and sometimes those solutions required safe drugs, or safe vaccines. Don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater.
I don’t think I’m attacking, at least that’s not my intent. Pro vax is pro vax, I would like to know which vax is generally safe? I don’t subscribe to a flu vax because I don’t think it’s worth it. Comparing vitamins to vaccines? Even now I’m watching out for vitamins as they don’t seem all to me made the same, but vaccines are completely different IMO. Drugs is a big umbrella, as there is a bunch of garbage in existence and FDA approved. On principle alone since this COVID era, I would never take another vaccine (if I was pro vax). All trust in that industry should be lost. I say beware of anybody who wants to improve the formula. I’ve been in corporate medicine myself for 25 years and I fired six doctors in one day once, so no need to authenticate yourself to me. I know who you are. But thanks for your concern for me. I think all vaccines should be stopped, but I’ll be kind and say they should be paused. Can you tell Bobby we should have a real VAERS with interactive dashboards and ethical data cleansing. Like find properly documented ages in the summary and populating the age field. Same thing for death dates, etc. Even Bobby knows VAERS doesn’t publish all legitimate reports received! You know that right? How about deleting legitimate reports, meaning not duplicate or false. How about the throttling aka purposeful delay in publishing reports? Do you not think VAERS doesn’t run cover for big pharma? Give me a chance to show you, anytime. Michael Baum was using my Deleted Reports dashboard for the MERCK HPV class action, I gave him and his team a carpet ride a long time ago. I’ve linked every deleted report within a interactive dashboard as far back as Medalerts goes. Catch things like the dead Pfizer trial victim that was deleted. I’m also Beaudoin’s canary on the fence catching any deaths from the states he’s looking for within the time frames he wants. My selective perception is vaccines are no good. Everybody is allowed to have an opinion. Oh there is about ~12 trial victims deleted from VAERS, they just didn’t die, at least not on initial report. Maybe they are now since dead who knows? God Bless.
I agree. While I admit there theoretically could be a good vax, in reality it would need to be against something with a fatality rate well above 10% in younger folk, and have a strong track record of not only saving lives but showing almost no long term effects, while being monitored by extremely skeptical people. Maybe people who have lost loved ones to bad vaccines.
We're about to be told there's a new "bug" with a higher than 10% fatality rate. What they WON'T mention, is that the unvaccinated aren't dying from "it." And the REASON this will be the case, is that it's the LAST vaccines causing the new "epidemic" which they INTEND to blame on a new "bug."
Look for an announcement that there's a new "strain" of HIV (or similar) which is MUCH deadlier and far more contagious. This seems the most likely way they will blame the complete destruction of the human immune system (via the vaccines) on something ELSE (a "bug" for which vaccines MUST be mandated, due to the high fatality rate).
Did you not know that the PCR test was proven to produce a 97% false positives? Did you not know that the CDC admitted that 94% of all so-called "covid" deaths carried an average of 2.6% co-morbidities, INCLUDING things like bullet wounds to the head? FWI: Comorbidity means something ELSE that kills the person.
In what world do you think we can trust government to force-inject all of us at their whim? Do you think we can trust ANYTHING they have to say to us about WHY we must all be injected? Do you think that these lying, murderous slags will magically start telling us the truth? If their products were "safe" (or ever could be) they wouldn't NEED to mandate them.
The primary reason many people don't want to be injected is because we KNOW these drugs are incredibly UNSAFE and that they don't actually protect us from ANYTHING.
You're writing things which make it appear you think you're addressing 4 year-old retards who cannot think, and who know NOTHING about what's going on right now in this arena. But this is NOT the audience for your defense of vaccines and those who continue pushing for them, but just "safer" ones.
And in all honesty, if Trump doesn’t do a Mia culpa I’ll vote for Bobby. If a candidate checks my 99 boxes but doesn’t check my number #1 box then I can’t vote for that person on principle. Bobby would at least be better for the future of vaccines IMO.
The idea that we could somehow trust that ANY drugs are "safe" (cuz government says so) is what keeps the vaccine mandate door wide OPEN for all of us and our children.
ALL vaccines have been formally classified ALL vaccines as "unavoidably unsafe." SEE Restatement (2nd) of Torts § 402A, comment K.
So the NEXT time the government and pharma assure you the "new" vaccine is "safer" or "safe" are you THEN going to be okay with mandates and ZERO liability for damage and deaths? There is only ONE reason to eliminate liability for the makers, and this is that their products are DESTRUCTIVE. We do NOT need vaccines. We need safety FROM them.
Generally, I would vote for anyone I could agree with perhaps 80% of the time. But in present times, medical freedom is everything. Because if ANY person (eg: government) can force us to put anything in our bodies, we ARE slaves. Nay, worse than slaves.
I agree that being free of government intrusion (injection;-) into our bodies is the imperative, because lower taxes and secure borders are worth nothing to a DEAD person. Sadly, Bobby supports the climate hoax, the "final solution" for which is the extermination of almost all of humanity. It's a strange religion that makes it odd Bobby would actually be interested in "saving lives." And under the Agenda of the WEF climate hoaxers, they kill us via "any means necessary" which includes starvation, along with abolishing the right to own anything, even our own labor.
Right now, the field of options for U.S. President looks like it leads to the extermination agenda no matter which road we take. The WEF owns all horses in the race.
Does RFK, Jr. REALLY believe in the climate hoax? To be honest, I don't follow him closely (except for his interviews on vaccines), so I don't know the extent to which he is married to the "climate change is due to human activities" notion.
I was shocked to see him pushing Gretta Thunberg on Twitter a couple of years back. He is very "passionate" about supporting the climate hoax, carbon tax, Agenda 21/30, etc. So justification for slaughtering most of humanity is there, he just advocates for doing it via other means I guess. And he is only talking about "restoring trust" by "reforming" the existing agencies (they should admit their "mistakes" so we will "trust" them again). NONE of this was a mistake. He of all people knows this. So his position that any of this is forgivable or acceptable if the perps will just admit they made mistakes, is quite odd to me.
It's interesting to see him expose as much as he does, and then arguing only for "safer" vaccines, (that WOULD be okay to mandate in his mind?) and "forgiveness" (pardon) for all of the perps. The "all of this was just a series of innocent mistakes" tour is worse for medical freedom than if he'd just stayed out of the battle.
Written like a true snakeoil gatekeeper you are!!
What's the point of having or striving for safe drugs, or more to the point safe snakeoils when they are not required in the first place? They DON'T work. In a lot of cases these days the drugs are attempting to 'mend' the damage caused from the jabs!!
It's amazing that any of my generation (early 60s) are still alive having only had 3 jabs. My son and daughter (late 80s) had around 18, and my lovely granddaughters (2015 and 2017) will probably have 50 before they are in their teens (my numbers might not be 100% correct, but the trend is). Loading the coffers of Big Pharma, and the trickle down to their snakeoil administration 'agents' ie GPs is the only reason I can see for my family 3:18:50 ratio I have seen. It's certainly got NOTHING to do with health. It's also why Germ Theory is still a theory well over a century after the likes of that clown Pasteur loaded their garbage on the world.
I am a qualified Chemist with over 25 years experience in analytical chemistry involving method development and method validation. I blindly followed the set out vax program for my 2 children because I trusted the authorities. In Jan 2020 I stumbled across the Drosden PCR test and the rapid adoption of it by the corrupt to the core WHO. A test method NEVER validated, and it was this that sent me down the rabbit hole of medicine. I am currently doing a degree in Epidemiology, Immunology and Human Sciences along side my other research, which includes the history of medicine, to look at both sides. Quite frankly I am disgusted at the morals of so called 'professionals' and their 'governing' bodies. In fact the morals start and end with their pay cheques. I know this is rife throughout the world in other sectors, but I always imagined/hoped the 'Do no harm' principle was set in stone. How wrong I was.
ALL vaccines are destructive and do far more HARM that any of their hypothetical claims of benefit. Your idea that there is some way to "cleanse" these inherently DESTRUCTIVE injections (which are directly responsible well over 90% of the deadly and disabling diseases suffered by Americans today) and throw out the bathwater ONLY, is misguided.
It is the very act of injecting foreign proteins into the body that causes immune system dysfunction. In NO WORLD can it ever be "safe" to inject foreign proteins directly into the body. And the entire theory of a vaccinology is premised upon injecting foreign proteins into the body. The FDA & pharma tell us to go on eating TRASH foods, and the FDA (who works for pharma) is presently attempting to criminalize the use of vitamin C, D, etc.
This freak show of show-called "health" experts want only ONE thing, and this is DEPOPULATION. Go ahead and "trust" them the next time they assure you their drugs are "safe." They are not only extremely destructive, there is ZERO possible benefit to any of this madness. You don't get health, (or "immunity") from a drug. If you're in poor health (either from toxins or malnutrition) you're going to get sick, no matter how many injections you take.
And pharma will blame your illness on a virus or bacteria, AND a lack of vaccines. But the virus/bacteria show up AFTER the fact, the same way maggots show up AFTER an animal dies. Just because you found maggots at the "scene of the crime" doesn't mean the maggots killed the animal.