Just like I don't believe there should be one source for medical guidance, I believe the same for the analysis of data. There are different audiences to target one's work, with different strengths of one's work to be highlighted. I'm glad all of these different people are trying the best they can, given their experience, personality, resources, and priorities at whatever moment in time (we all have lives outside the realm of covid that not everyone needs to know what our constraints are). No one should be believed or trusted blindly. I tend to take only parts of what each person has to say based on what I deem important or what I believe constitutes good science and/or a relevant issue, which varies person to person. That said, I thank you for your work, and I will continue to link to it in comment replies or in posts, but I would not say any one person or application or source is the best. Collectively, we help advance.
So right you are Lee! I'm very competitive probably from the baseball and football and everything else. For anybody that is also competitive they know it's a defense mechanism because on some level we are scared or nervous. Those are the butterflies in the stomach before every game. Like Mike Tyson says, every fighter has a plan until you get punched in face, then your plan goes out the window. I've been playing nice for a very long time, now I've been punched in the face and slapped into reality. Motivation comes in many forms, speaking for self. Sometimes I need to psych myself out because I'm actually super nervous/scared or super pissed. I don't worry about what space I'm renting in someone else's head. God Bless
Albert, please keep my name out of this. GW is a professional liar, paid to stir BS non-stop by who knows who. I enjoyed beating him up in public immensely, enjoyed watching him sweat and I see him panic and block me, but any use of this for personal publicity - I will call it out in every public meeting as it is. If you associate with this guy in any serious manner, you will lose any and all credibility.
Thank you so much Albert for this piece. The Covid-19 territory is large. Traversing it is bewildering. There are thousands of paths, criss-crossing each other in confusing ways. I spend day and night trying to get the lay of the land. It has always seemed to me that the hot lot trail is extremely important, even if it does not end up where it seems to be headed. I think that some (like Jessica maybe?) do not walk it because they fear that if it deadends it will undermine the credibility of the medical freedom movement. I understand that. I have been somewhat influenced by Jessica to not follow it closely - and there are so many other trails to follow. But this article helps me to keep it vivid in my mind and to build a mental model of the territory - so thank you.
As for your promotion of your role in this I do not mind. We all have our personal reasons for what we do, and being honest about this only helps. You are an honest guy.
Yup, really challenging to assess Truth. My gut says - that which makes you strong tends to be true. FWIW, regarding covid the person I trust the most is David Martin, and the person I trust the least is crybaby Robert Malone. Of course, that is merely my opinion.
Are you able to clarify why Mod-RNA was used but many otherwise educated souls opposed to vaccines ignore this and continue to shriek mRNA bad? I come from a background studying the fake Vietnam Protest movement top down and keep returning to that period as a bizzare symbol of faux-resistance. I recall not only Tim Leary but the People Investigating Leary's Lies who held a press conference to denounce him but later kissed and made up.
No. Pfizer documents indicate no mRNA is in the vaccine. Mod-RNA is not mRNA. Everyone continues to speak of mRNA. Mod-RNA is not modified mRNA. ”In his statement, Renz claims that the widely recognized mRNA technology, allegedly utilized in the vaccines, is not what it appears to be.” “Sharing his research on Twitter, lawyer Tom Renz exposed that the COVID-19 vaccines, widely advertised as mRNA (messenger RNA) vaccines, are in fact lab-created hybrids known as modRNA.
This was widely known as of December 2020. This was never a secret. The modification (pseudouridine) was disclosed and discussed by many professionals like Judy Mikovitz and Peter McCollough and Jessica Rose, and Mike Yeadon, the list goes on. I read 2000+ pages of manufacturing and preclinical documentation from Pfizer and Moderna which Tom Renz never bothered to look at, and now presents this as "breaking news".
Yikes! I did not know, better late than never, but very good to know. Thank God the truth has a way of defending itself. God Bless you Sasha, keep fighting.
Ok. And why is everyone rapping mRNA and not Mod-RNA. I admit my great ignorance on this diabolic subject leads me into cul-de-sacs worthy of Alice in Wonderland. “When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.’
’The question is,’ said Alice, ‘whether you can make words mean so many different things.’
’The question is,’ said Humpty Dumpty, ‘which is to be master — that’s all.”
yes, I can't upload the docs I have here, but suffice to point to peer reviewed published literature, for example this paper from nature. Clearly states MODIFIED RNA - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2639-4
Tom Renz-https://tomrenz.substack.com/p/mrna-and-why-it-matters?utm_source=%2Fsearch%2Fmod-RNA&utm_medium=reader2
This article is pretty science heavy so at this point I also want to acknowledge two additional points. First, I am not a Peter McCullough/Harvey Risch type scientist. I am a lawyer with some science background. That means that I am not the guy that will be creating science, but to do my job as an attorney litigating in this area I have to be able to read and understand the science. I do those things quite well. Second, the information in this article is based simply on reading and understanding the science. There is nothing here I’ve created - I just know how to read.
Disclaimers aside, I want to open this article with a confession. This article was titled using the acronym mRNA but that was intentionally misleading. For purposes of this article - the things mRNA actually stands for modRNA which is different from mRNA. mRNA is messenger RNA and is found all over in life. modRNA is laboratory modified RNA that has been synthetically created for a purpose. It can be more durable, and have substantially greater impact than a true mRNA and can do many other things.
Upgrade to paid
Why does this matter? Well let’s start with the COVID “vaccines”. Because mRNA is a weak particle and breaks down easily with a relatively lower risk of messing with your genetics than other gene therapy products (like modRNA) that is what is always talked about in the jabs. The problem is that it is a lie. Here is the FDA label for the Pfizer jab:
Just like I don't believe there should be one source for medical guidance, I believe the same for the analysis of data. There are different audiences to target one's work, with different strengths of one's work to be highlighted. I'm glad all of these different people are trying the best they can, given their experience, personality, resources, and priorities at whatever moment in time (we all have lives outside the realm of covid that not everyone needs to know what our constraints are). No one should be believed or trusted blindly. I tend to take only parts of what each person has to say based on what I deem important or what I believe constitutes good science and/or a relevant issue, which varies person to person. That said, I thank you for your work, and I will continue to link to it in comment replies or in posts, but I would not say any one person or application or source is the best. Collectively, we help advance.
So right you are Lee! I'm very competitive probably from the baseball and football and everything else. For anybody that is also competitive they know it's a defense mechanism because on some level we are scared or nervous. Those are the butterflies in the stomach before every game. Like Mike Tyson says, every fighter has a plan until you get punched in face, then your plan goes out the window. I've been playing nice for a very long time, now I've been punched in the face and slapped into reality. Motivation comes in many forms, speaking for self. Sometimes I need to psych myself out because I'm actually super nervous/scared or super pissed. I don't worry about what space I'm renting in someone else's head. God Bless
Albert, please keep my name out of this. GW is a professional liar, paid to stir BS non-stop by who knows who. I enjoyed beating him up in public immensely, enjoyed watching him sweat and I see him panic and block me, but any use of this for personal publicity - I will call it out in every public meeting as it is. If you associate with this guy in any serious manner, you will lose any and all credibility.
Understood, and thank you for your concern for me.
gulit by association. now that’s what i like. gets me interested.
You've usually seen everything Eagle88, but I found this very worthy to warn everyone about, speaking of Sasha.
https://rumble.com/v3hg4mi-hospitals-hiding-covid-killing-in-dedicated-wards.html
Thank you so much Albert for this piece. The Covid-19 territory is large. Traversing it is bewildering. There are thousands of paths, criss-crossing each other in confusing ways. I spend day and night trying to get the lay of the land. It has always seemed to me that the hot lot trail is extremely important, even if it does not end up where it seems to be headed. I think that some (like Jessica maybe?) do not walk it because they fear that if it deadends it will undermine the credibility of the medical freedom movement. I understand that. I have been somewhat influenced by Jessica to not follow it closely - and there are so many other trails to follow. But this article helps me to keep it vivid in my mind and to build a mental model of the territory - so thank you.
As for your promotion of your role in this I do not mind. We all have our personal reasons for what we do, and being honest about this only helps. You are an honest guy.
Yup, really challenging to assess Truth. My gut says - that which makes you strong tends to be true. FWIW, regarding covid the person I trust the most is David Martin, and the person I trust the least is crybaby Robert Malone. Of course, that is merely my opinion.
I like : )
Are you able to clarify why Mod-RNA was used but many otherwise educated souls opposed to vaccines ignore this and continue to shriek mRNA bad? I come from a background studying the fake Vietnam Protest movement top down and keep returning to that period as a bizzare symbol of faux-resistance. I recall not only Tim Leary but the People Investigating Leary's Lies who held a press conference to denounce him but later kissed and made up.
I get the faux Vietnam resistance part, but am confused about the m (modified-which-is-not-messenger-RNA question.
Am I understanding you to imply the modified RNA is healthy in an injection?
I understood it as being, at a minimum, problematic and in the current application, harmful if not a deadly part of the equation......?
No. Pfizer documents indicate no mRNA is in the vaccine. Mod-RNA is not mRNA. Everyone continues to speak of mRNA. Mod-RNA is not modified mRNA. ”In his statement, Renz claims that the widely recognized mRNA technology, allegedly utilized in the vaccines, is not what it appears to be.” “Sharing his research on Twitter, lawyer Tom Renz exposed that the COVID-19 vaccines, widely advertised as mRNA (messenger RNA) vaccines, are in fact lab-created hybrids known as modRNA.
This was widely known as of December 2020. This was never a secret. The modification (pseudouridine) was disclosed and discussed by many professionals like Judy Mikovitz and Peter McCollough and Jessica Rose, and Mike Yeadon, the list goes on. I read 2000+ pages of manufacturing and preclinical documentation from Pfizer and Moderna which Tom Renz never bothered to look at, and now presents this as "breaking news".
Yikes! I did not know, better late than never, but very good to know. Thank God the truth has a way of defending itself. God Bless you Sasha, keep fighting.
Ok. And why is everyone rapping mRNA and not Mod-RNA. I admit my great ignorance on this diabolic subject leads me into cul-de-sacs worthy of Alice in Wonderland. “When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.’
’The question is,’ said Alice, ‘whether you can make words mean so many different things.’
’The question is,’ said Humpty Dumpty, ‘which is to be master — that’s all.”
― Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking Glass
is that “manufacturing documentation” publicly available?
yes, I can't upload the docs I have here, but suffice to point to peer reviewed published literature, for example this paper from nature. Clearly states MODIFIED RNA - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2639-4
Ok. I think we're saying the same thing....my understanding is: we have naturally occurring MESSENGER RNA in our bodies.
The injections being discussed have MODIFIED RNA, or synthetic mRNA.
Not good for any living thing it was tested in for two decades as far as I know.
Dr Jane Ruby has been teaching this repeatedly for the past 3 years.
Who are the "many otherwise educated souls opposed to vaccines ignore this and continue to shriek mRNA bad?"
Isn't modified/synthetic lab-created hybrid RNA bad as Tom Renz says?
Sorry if I'm being dense here.
Tom Renz-https://tomrenz.substack.com/p/mrna-and-why-it-matters?utm_source=%2Fsearch%2Fmod-RNA&utm_medium=reader2
This article is pretty science heavy so at this point I also want to acknowledge two additional points. First, I am not a Peter McCullough/Harvey Risch type scientist. I am a lawyer with some science background. That means that I am not the guy that will be creating science, but to do my job as an attorney litigating in this area I have to be able to read and understand the science. I do those things quite well. Second, the information in this article is based simply on reading and understanding the science. There is nothing here I’ve created - I just know how to read.
Disclaimers aside, I want to open this article with a confession. This article was titled using the acronym mRNA but that was intentionally misleading. For purposes of this article - the things mRNA actually stands for modRNA which is different from mRNA. mRNA is messenger RNA and is found all over in life. modRNA is laboratory modified RNA that has been synthetically created for a purpose. It can be more durable, and have substantially greater impact than a true mRNA and can do many other things.
Upgrade to paid
Why does this matter? Well let’s start with the COVID “vaccines”. Because mRNA is a weak particle and breaks down easily with a relatively lower risk of messing with your genetics than other gene therapy products (like modRNA) that is what is always talked about in the jabs. The problem is that it is a lie. Here is the FDA label for the Pfizer jab:
Yes, I've had
https://labeling.pfizer.com/ShowLabeling.aspx?id=14471
in my documents for 8 months.
Here is another interesting post on it if you haven't seen it.
The comments are illuminating!
https://edv1694.substack.com/p/read-the-label-its-biontechs-vaccine
https://investors.biontech.de/news-releases/news-release-details/biontech-and-fosun-pharma-form-covid-19-vaccine-strategic