Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Lee Muller's avatar

Just like I don't believe there should be one source for medical guidance, I believe the same for the analysis of data. There are different audiences to target one's work, with different strengths of one's work to be highlighted. I'm glad all of these different people are trying the best they can, given their experience, personality, resources, and priorities at whatever moment in time (we all have lives outside the realm of covid that not everyone needs to know what our constraints are). No one should be believed or trusted blindly. I tend to take only parts of what each person has to say based on what I deem important or what I believe constitutes good science and/or a relevant issue, which varies person to person. That said, I thank you for your work, and I will continue to link to it in comment replies or in posts, but I would not say any one person or application or source is the best. Collectively, we help advance.

Expand full comment
Sasha Latypova's avatar

Albert, please keep my name out of this. GW is a professional liar, paid to stir BS non-stop by who knows who. I enjoyed beating him up in public immensely, enjoyed watching him sweat and I see him panic and block me, but any use of this for personal publicity - I will call it out in every public meeting as it is. If you associate with this guy in any serious manner, you will lose any and all credibility.

Expand full comment
20 more comments...

No posts