7 Comments

Curious of your thoughts - VAERS has 1.6 million total adverse events globally - source here:

https://vaersanalysis.info/2024/10/05/vaers-summary-for-covid-19-vaccines-through-9-27-2024/

The split is a million US AEs and 600,000 ex-US (deriving the ex-US from the total AE's less US AE's).

Total US doses from here: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/covid-vaccine-doses-by-manufacturer?country=~USA show 670 million in total for the US with with 400 million Pfizer and 250 million Moderna.

Pfizer claims 4.6 billion doses shipped (not administered) globally. here https://www.pfizer.com/science/coronavirus/vaccine/working-to-reach-everyone-everywhere

I guesstimate that Moderna shipped maybe 2.4 billion globally in total

How can 670 million PFE and MRNA doses cause a million AE;s and over 6 billion doss ONLY cause 600,000 AE's outside the US?

Expand full comment

Peter Thanks. Where I say VAERS runs cover for pharma, V-Safe also ran cover for VAERS. There are over 10,094,310 in V-Safe with only at least ~40K common reports comingled into VAERS. Sure as many as minimum ~3M V-Safe registrants had seemingly nothing wrong and only participated in a "survey" as good Americans. Maybe a ballpark of 7M V-safe could have been crosswalked into VAERS or could have technically been also reported into VAERS because of some level of adverse event. Here in the USA there seemed to be an active push to steer people into V-Safe if they had a AE or if they just wanted to self monitor themselves using the V-Safe app. I think many people were under a false assurance impression that our government was monitoring adverse events using the V-Safe system. As you know ICAN or CDC/FDA is a few months behind already submitting the narrative portion of the reports to ICAN or ICAN to the public. We still do not a complete view of VSAFE nor do we know exactly how many V-Safe Registrants actually died while taking the 1 year survey? So far I located about ~700 victims that clearly died in V-SAFE and I highly doubt very few of these if any are comingled into VAERS as well? This is a added layer of complexity to the Under Reporting Factor (URF) that did not exist during those days of the Lazarus Study aka the Harvard Pilgrim Study of 2010.

Expand full comment

Oh, been wondering where you've been. Glad you weren't with Jordan Peterson in re-education camp, lol, not.

Expand full comment

Nice work! Good reporting. Thank you.

Expand full comment

Thank you for this, and for reporting! Impressive work.

Expand full comment

If the VAERS report 3,862, then you must multiply this number by AT LEAST 100 times to get closer to the truth. (386,200)

You see, the VAERS reports "less than 1%" of adverse events which occur shortly after injection. SEE: https://digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/electronic-support-public-health-vaccine-adverse-event-reporting-system

Nobody has ever "debunked" this study. It stands completely unrefuted to this day. In fact, the reporting was MUCH LESS THAN "less than 1%" with covid, due to the CDC having ordered all of the hospitals to fraudulently classify those who showed up dying from recent vaccinations as "unvaccinated" (if it they'd only been jabbed once, or it had been less than 2 weeks since their 2nd jab).

I don't know how anything gets reported as a "vaccine injury" when the person's medical file states (fraudulently) they're "unvaccinated."

Expand full comment

Slightly O/T.

I have a suspicion that the OWD data per manufacturer is either the result of a computer model or evidece that the number of doses was administered by quota - implying a sort of commercial ratioing overseen by th military/DHS.

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/covid-vaccine-doses-by-manufacturer?country=~USA

There looks to me to be a 61%:39% constant split in the injections for the last 18-24 months.

Expand full comment