So much for "if anyone wants the data, then they are very welcome to it". Here is how sciencecouncil.org defines a scientist"
Our definition of a scientist
A scientist is someone who systematically gathers and uses research and evidence, to make hypotheses and test them, to gain and share understanding and knowledge.
So by this definition, Albert the Eagle is definitely a scientist, but Vibeke doesn't make the cut - she's unwilling to share understanding and knowledge.
That's a great observation, unfortunately that does not reveal itself with just the 55 Sweden deaths in VAERS for B,G,Y lots. Maybe they want to be the first to make that observation...? I wonder what all the other data looks like, not just the BGY, I know which ones are the additional Pfizer and Moderna lots look like? Heck, there even a few Novavax and JJ that came from Sweden...
Absolutely plausible. In Sweden only, there are 404 deaths reports. 53% (216 of 404) are over 80yrs old. 216 deaths were vaxxed in 20' and first quarter of 2021. 68% (146 of 216) were over 80yrs old, but 69% (101 of 146) women. Sweden must some really old female healthcare workers...?
No doubt this is a attack on fertility, I guess we'll just have to wait for the Denmark team to explain it to us. Their assertion about the harmless yellow lots is still bullshit, they are getting played like a cheap fiddle or playing the Simpletons like a cheap fiddle. I guess it's still good for the cause, like righteous lying or something? However, this is just taking longer to reveal the more sinister truth and that is that all this data is curated, throttled and obfuscated by the entities entrusted with our global health. So many people run cover for big pharma, they just do not have the wisdom to know the difference....
Wow. So much for her promise to Dr. Mccullough to share with anyone. So she will share, but only to those she chooses kind of like CDC, FDA, Pfizer, Moderna. Yes, it is best to keep all data secret and not let the general public see it. That's definitely the way to build confidence in "science".
Oh dear, it's obvious to me, after watching the video, the body language, that she was not sincere. They don't want data analysts checking their figures, especially you, Albert, with your eagle eye!
Hey Albert, I would never trust, or have any interest to spend time reading ANYONE'S stuff that wouldn't be first vetted by you. Or at least quickly approved by you.
My maiden name is Bohr and "doctor" Manniche would not get through the front door (or the back) I hope, of Denmark's most famous science institution, The Bohr Institute.
Super cool about your connection to the Bohr Institute. Ya know in all honesty, I think when they first did the analysis they were correct, but had no idea of the throttling, they didn't even have the lot expiration dates for goodness sakes. They could not see the super obvious which was the most toxic were the oldest and first lots to roll out and the yellow "placebo" were the newest and many of the yellow lots hadn't even expired by the vax date "cut-off" observation window. However six of seven harmless yellow death reports were published in VAERS by May 27, 2022 aka a month and couple days before vax date cut-off window! I'll give them the smallest of passes and only say maybe somehow these death reports were not in their data? I doubt it, but that's what really needs to be examined to determine if fraud was committed by government pharmacovigilance systems, or the Denmark team is just lazy idiots? It's one or the other, but I really don't think they are lazy idiots, these folks seem to be trying to do the right thing? Now in hindsight, they've been on to many stages to pivot over to the throttling theory and pharmacofraudulance that I've been talking about since forever and changing their tune on the harmless lots. Three distinct categories? Yeah but you'd need to move some yellows to green, some greens to blue. I think in their severe events "ranking" they weight a death the same as a hospitalization.... that's kind of simplistic lame. IMO.
I get it at face value I wouldn't want to share with a prickly pear like me either, but I'm not the scientist, I'm not the PhD. WTH? Do people just say I'm a PhD from this university and we are supposed to take their word for it and not double check anything? I double check everything!! I'm an auditor, I'm trained to think everybody is hiding something... Bottom line is they have pie on their face now and hope nobody notices...
Wow, Albert what you just wrote is EXACTLY what's happening with everything.
"Now in hindsight, they've been on too many stages to pivot over to the throttling theory and pharmacofraudulance that I've been talking about since forever and changing their tune on the harmless lots."
And, "Do people just say I'm a PhD from this university and we are supposed to take their word for it and not double check anything?"
Yep. The Religion of Human Hubris where small little minds are gods standing on stages.
Well we know who runs the system of things, especially the airwaves, media, money, medicine, and war. Systems of fear and death. For a little while.
I am so proud to know someone who's as gifted with data - and double checking it - as you. God's watching and He sure as hell doesn't count a hospitalization the same as a death of one of his beloveds.
Thanks for reminding me of where to donate.
All blessings of love and protection to you and your mom and family.
You're a claims expert, so many would call you a data scientist. I don't get where anybody gets by denying honest researchers the opportunity to look at data. "The truth is like a lion," etc. Keep your head up, Eagle. You're doing good work.
So much for "if anyone wants the data, then they are very welcome to it". Here is how sciencecouncil.org defines a scientist"
Our definition of a scientist
A scientist is someone who systematically gathers and uses research and evidence, to make hypotheses and test them, to gain and share understanding and knowledge.
So by this definition, Albert the Eagle is definitely a scientist, but Vibeke doesn't make the cut - she's unwilling to share understanding and knowledge.
Interesting fact for your deep data diving Albert.
Denmark had a much greater proportion of Women Healthcare workers than Sweden when the Covid19 Pandemic hit.
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/edn-20210308-1
That's a great observation, unfortunately that does not reveal itself with just the 55 Sweden deaths in VAERS for B,G,Y lots. Maybe they want to be the first to make that observation...? I wonder what all the other data looks like, not just the BGY, I know which ones are the additional Pfizer and Moderna lots look like? Heck, there even a few Novavax and JJ that came from Sweden...
The very first VAERS Covid19 reports for Denmark and Sweden would have been injured Healthcare workers.
Absolutely plausible. In Sweden only, there are 404 deaths reports. 53% (216 of 404) are over 80yrs old. 216 deaths were vaxxed in 20' and first quarter of 2021. 68% (146 of 216) were over 80yrs old, but 69% (101 of 146) women. Sweden must some really old female healthcare workers...?
I'll look at the age distribution of all VAERS cases now that you found age from text. I have some early reports preserved before EU demanded editing.
No doubt this is a attack on fertility, I guess we'll just have to wait for the Denmark team to explain it to us. Their assertion about the harmless yellow lots is still bullshit, they are getting played like a cheap fiddle or playing the Simpletons like a cheap fiddle. I guess it's still good for the cause, like righteous lying or something? However, this is just taking longer to reveal the more sinister truth and that is that all this data is curated, throttled and obfuscated by the entities entrusted with our global health. So many people run cover for big pharma, they just do not have the wisdom to know the difference....
Wow. So much for her promise to Dr. Mccullough to share with anyone. So she will share, but only to those she chooses kind of like CDC, FDA, Pfizer, Moderna. Yes, it is best to keep all data secret and not let the general public see it. That's definitely the way to build confidence in "science".
Oh dear, it's obvious to me, after watching the video, the body language, that she was not sincere. They don't want data analysts checking their figures, especially you, Albert, with your eagle eye!
Hey Albert, I would never trust, or have any interest to spend time reading ANYONE'S stuff that wouldn't be first vetted by you. Or at least quickly approved by you.
My maiden name is Bohr and "doctor" Manniche would not get through the front door (or the back) I hope, of Denmark's most famous science institution, The Bohr Institute.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niels_Bohr_Institute
I hope the Bohr Institute hasn't sold out along with most of the pedigreed western world of
religions, medicine, academics, musicians - and worst of all, harlot "scientists".
Or maybe the degreed class are just not that bright or brave.
On another note, I'd like to renew my support for The Eagle - I think you have Ko-fi, right?
God bless you. Here is what I got: https://www.vaersaware.com/donate
Super cool about your connection to the Bohr Institute. Ya know in all honesty, I think when they first did the analysis they were correct, but had no idea of the throttling, they didn't even have the lot expiration dates for goodness sakes. They could not see the super obvious which was the most toxic were the oldest and first lots to roll out and the yellow "placebo" were the newest and many of the yellow lots hadn't even expired by the vax date "cut-off" observation window. However six of seven harmless yellow death reports were published in VAERS by May 27, 2022 aka a month and couple days before vax date cut-off window! I'll give them the smallest of passes and only say maybe somehow these death reports were not in their data? I doubt it, but that's what really needs to be examined to determine if fraud was committed by government pharmacovigilance systems, or the Denmark team is just lazy idiots? It's one or the other, but I really don't think they are lazy idiots, these folks seem to be trying to do the right thing? Now in hindsight, they've been on to many stages to pivot over to the throttling theory and pharmacofraudulance that I've been talking about since forever and changing their tune on the harmless lots. Three distinct categories? Yeah but you'd need to move some yellows to green, some greens to blue. I think in their severe events "ranking" they weight a death the same as a hospitalization.... that's kind of simplistic lame. IMO.
I get it at face value I wouldn't want to share with a prickly pear like me either, but I'm not the scientist, I'm not the PhD. WTH? Do people just say I'm a PhD from this university and we are supposed to take their word for it and not double check anything? I double check everything!! I'm an auditor, I'm trained to think everybody is hiding something... Bottom line is they have pie on their face now and hope nobody notices...
Wow, Albert what you just wrote is EXACTLY what's happening with everything.
"Now in hindsight, they've been on too many stages to pivot over to the throttling theory and pharmacofraudulance that I've been talking about since forever and changing their tune on the harmless lots."
And, "Do people just say I'm a PhD from this university and we are supposed to take their word for it and not double check anything?"
Yep. The Religion of Human Hubris where small little minds are gods standing on stages.
Well we know who runs the system of things, especially the airwaves, media, money, medicine, and war. Systems of fear and death. For a little while.
I am so proud to know someone who's as gifted with data - and double checking it - as you. God's watching and He sure as hell doesn't count a hospitalization the same as a death of one of his beloveds.
Thanks for reminding me of where to donate.
All blessings of love and protection to you and your mom and family.
You're a claims expert, so many would call you a data scientist. I don't get where anybody gets by denying honest researchers the opportunity to look at data. "The truth is like a lion," etc. Keep your head up, Eagle. You're doing good work.
I can't imagine any REAL scientist refusing to share data, regardless of who wants it.
what lame-O excuse for Science do they worship?
It is beyond pathetic, it is deliberate obfuscation bordering on censorship.
The group has lost credibilty. Once lost difficult to impossible to regain.
Examples of Swedish VAERS cases reported by Pfizer. I wonder if anyone has the full Pfizer collection?
SE-PFIZER INC-2021534507 baby case
SE-PFIZER INC-202100960895 baby case
SE-PFIZER INC-2021712960 mother/neonate
SE-PFIZER INC-202200272631
SE-PFIZER INC-2021158745
SE-PFIZER INC-2021519057
!!!