6 Comments

Thanks for that analysis. We now see nearly all the lots listed were the original Phosphate buffer, with only a couple with the Tromethamine substitution.

Expand full comment

Thanks for doing all this information it must be time consuming. Was Australia not on there? Also, I was finding it a bit confusing regarding the two countries Denmark/Danes and Netherlands/Dutch : )

Expand full comment
author

Yikes I'm confused to! I can never get Danes & Dutch straight! I may have to do the the whole thing over again! If Dutch is Netherlands, I pooped the bed! Uuuugh... Darn

Expand full comment

Yes, you pooped the bed. ;-) I'm Dutch and you confused me too.

Dutch government is not very transparent about the whole Covid era...suddenly everything is a private matter when questions arise about how many died with and without the vaccination. They also change the law on jan.1. 2020, Next of kin can't inspect the medical file of a deceased patient. You may also not provide a copy of this. You may only provide data from the file if there is an exception.

We name our prime minister Pinocchio, because he is constantly lying thru his teeth about everything.

Expand full comment

GREAT WORK!! You really knocked this one out of the park. I'll share it with the authors.

Expand full comment
author

Cool. The 2nd part is going to be a lot more interesting as I've looked at "Denmark only". I feel like I'm playing chess with GDIT's algorithms, VAERS spits out reports (publish) in such a way that makes it impossible to find definitive patterns? What could look toxic lot per the Dutch group doesn't look necessarily toxic in VAERS when considering all other countries who used the same lots. It does squarely bring into question what exactly gets cross-walked into VAERS and what doesn't? The only guidelines from the CDC we have to go on is this: https://i.imgur.com/JVh31yB.jpg

Expand full comment