Last week I was approached to give a radio interview on a settled court case where a soldier claimed to have got MS due to a vaccination against Hepatitis-B-virus (HBV). The interview will be recorded tomorrow and presumable published next Wednesday.
Therefore I had jumped a bit into VAERS and the scientific literature before you posted the case.
Looking into VAERS, I think there might be a signal, at least, MS was quite frequent after HBV but less after influenza-vaccines. Yet not seriously investigated by me.
Then I found 2 NEJM article published in 2001, the one supported by Aventis-Pasteur und Merck, Sharpe and Dohme, the other by NIH and Merck.
At least I learned from these facts: Other people had concerns of a causal relationhip of MS and, in particular, the HBV vaccination, already before 2001. Hence, the companies thought that it would be a good idea to write "scientific" articles against such suspicions.
Both articles sound highly sophisticated - motto: I we cannot convince them we confuse them ... but covering the central issue that these papers did not try to really investigated the effect of these vaccines. Hence, if vaccines are not in the focus, how could they support or deny this factor?
My position is:
MS is a bacterial infection and not an autoimmune disease.
Hence, beforehand these (unknown) bacteria are the actual cause.
However, in this sence MS is a brain infection and normally bacteria would not go there - unless there is a strong inflammation/infection (e.g. by other bacteria or virus) that "opens" the blood-brain-barrier. I think, this could explain be the contributing factor of the HBV-vaccination.
However, I still have 2 problems with this explanation:
1. It appears that modRNA may also trigger MS. The modRNA stuff does not contain bacteria or virus. At least later on it increases the risks of infections.
2. The influenza vaccines appear to trigger MS considerably less frequent. Why?
Thank you much CV for being a true Truth Warrior. ALL vaccines are toxic. Dear Lord, deliver us from evil & help us to help ourselves continue to speak Truth to medical tyranny ...
For the time being I am hesitating to extend the suspicion to "ALL vaccines".
It appears that the oral polio(myelitis) vaccine (OPV) worked and was excellently tolerated.
I am also hesitating to use the attribut "toxic" in this respect. The problem is the benefit-risk balance (BRB). Look at OPV: It's BRB is likely good to excellent, although presumably not rigorously proven, maybe because it is overt.
However, they never properly investigated the BRB for any intramuscularly (IM) administered vaccines. Why? The Salk polio vaccine, an IM vaccine, proved to be desastrous.
It appears that the concept "IM vaccination" is questionable. The manufacturers should be obliged to demonstrate a favorable BRB for each product! Even for the old products.
Thank you very much!
Last week I was approached to give a radio interview on a settled court case where a soldier claimed to have got MS due to a vaccination against Hepatitis-B-virus (HBV). The interview will be recorded tomorrow and presumable published next Wednesday.
Therefore I had jumped a bit into VAERS and the scientific literature before you posted the case.
Looking into VAERS, I think there might be a signal, at least, MS was quite frequent after HBV but less after influenza-vaccines. Yet not seriously investigated by me.
Then I found 2 NEJM article published in 2001, the one supported by Aventis-Pasteur und Merck, Sharpe and Dohme, the other by NIH and Merck.
At least I learned from these facts: Other people had concerns of a causal relationhip of MS and, in particular, the HBV vaccination, already before 2001. Hence, the companies thought that it would be a good idea to write "scientific" articles against such suspicions.
Both articles sound highly sophisticated - motto: I we cannot convince them we confuse them ... but covering the central issue that these papers did not try to really investigated the effect of these vaccines. Hence, if vaccines are not in the focus, how could they support or deny this factor?
My position is:
MS is a bacterial infection and not an autoimmune disease.
Hence, beforehand these (unknown) bacteria are the actual cause.
However, in this sence MS is a brain infection and normally bacteria would not go there - unless there is a strong inflammation/infection (e.g. by other bacteria or virus) that "opens" the blood-brain-barrier. I think, this could explain be the contributing factor of the HBV-vaccination.
However, I still have 2 problems with this explanation:
1. It appears that modRNA may also trigger MS. The modRNA stuff does not contain bacteria or virus. At least later on it increases the risks of infections.
2. The influenza vaccines appear to trigger MS considerably less frequent. Why?
Thanks for the info! Hopefully more experts will jump in to make the connection...
Hepatitis B devastated my health. Also detrimental to my daughter. Now I know better! Thank you for your work!
Can it cause? Absolutely!
Does it cause? Seems most likely.
Where there's smoke.....
TY for your research. Keep waking up the lions.
Albert thank you for your wonderful work!
Thank you much CV for being a true Truth Warrior. ALL vaccines are toxic. Dear Lord, deliver us from evil & help us to help ourselves continue to speak Truth to medical tyranny ...
For the time being I am hesitating to extend the suspicion to "ALL vaccines".
It appears that the oral polio(myelitis) vaccine (OPV) worked and was excellently tolerated.
I am also hesitating to use the attribut "toxic" in this respect. The problem is the benefit-risk balance (BRB). Look at OPV: It's BRB is likely good to excellent, although presumably not rigorously proven, maybe because it is overt.
However, they never properly investigated the BRB for any intramuscularly (IM) administered vaccines. Why? The Salk polio vaccine, an IM vaccine, proved to be desastrous.
It appears that the concept "IM vaccination" is questionable. The manufacturers should be obliged to demonstrate a favorable BRB for each product! Even for the old products.