I have passed a link to this post on to Greg Glaser, my lead counsel on the Control Group lawsuit. He is also general counsel the Physicians for Informed Consent. If he is not positioned to consider this, he may know who is.
God Bless you Joy! I don't have to be the one to carry the football across the goal line, but I have information and a website and dashboards that are court room ready for anybody who wants to try! God Bless
God bless you for fighting. If the lawyers can have some $$ (damages) to get to, it really helps. The enemy needs to be hit in the wallet, HARD. Positioning the correct defendants will be key. You've done incredible work so far.
For sure CDC throttling and scrubbing data on VAERS is a deliberate fraud and dereliction of duty under many federal laws. Trouble is it's hard to overcome sovereign immunity and the military prototype contracts shielding the jab manufacturers with their bags of unlabeled jab ingredients coming from heaven knows where. And using the US military data is hard given so many laws allowing secrecy there. But going after "informed consent" for "human subject experiments" on "civilians" is easier.
It's going to take a Nuremberg type crimes versus humanity or an uninformed consent lawsuit on existing federal human subject medical experiment laws to nail any individual people in government or corporations to make any one person go to jail or pay cash damages. Anyone who got a jab at any time without full informed consent should have standing in court to nail those in government who authorized and those in corporations who also did this horrible human medical experiment. All those blank vial package paper inserts and the fraudulent VAERS data were all **intended** to deceive the public.
Have a look at these laws:
-- US Federal Code of Regulations (administrative law)
So far l've not seen anywhere any details of any IRB used to authorized mass public use of any of the jabs nor one seated after a human subject makes a formal request for one to review individual harm. Perhaps not one harmed victim or their executor after death has asked so far for an IRB to sit and review any human subject complaints as part of the first step of administrative oversight before a victim or his/her legal representative files a civl or criminal legal case.
Long ago, I used these IRB laws when I was harmed by a human medical experiment at a major university. The university's IRB met in a seedy trailer and after taking my testimony ordered the graduate student researcher to pay me in full the offered fee to human subjects after I'd left half way through the experiment appalled to discover he was a callous idiot dunderhead who thought nothing of doing outrageous physical harm to me without my consent.
USA law **allows** human medical experimenters to do harm without prior consent by the human guinea pigs if an IRB **ahead** of time thinks that is OK in the search for medical knowledge. But, that work-around is outrageous, frequently abused, usually done mby in IRB pencil-whipping not meeting in person to discuss it, but that process leaves a very useful paper trail with names and dataes of who did that criminal outrage.
The standing and appointed IRBs all know very well most humans agree to medical research for sheep-like altruistic reasons and the IRBs take advantage of that recklessly. In my case, it was a chaplain sitting on my IRB panel who was the **only** one with a shred of human care. The rest were all medical and PhD doctors who looked at me as if I was a fungible piece of stupid meat to be used and abused at their whims. But, once I told them to their faces in the seedy trailer I was a lawyer they were scared s---less. I told them I did my own legal research in their own university medical library. They were lucky I did not file a criminal assault & battery case with our local police and sheriff, and then a civil damages lawsuit.
My big legal question today is were the jab IRBs pre-jab use in experiments Summer 2020 and/or after the mass jab rollout when the jabs were legally still experimental civilian or military panels? If the latter, did Trump or Biden sign a posse comitatus declaration to be able to impose martial law on unwitting civilians?
Way to go on the warpath, Albert! Now you're a "legal eagle" as well! Good for you! I believe there are a lot more ways to skin a cat than we think, especially when fraud is involved. God bless you for what you're doing !
My mom is one of the two plaintiffs listed on the Class Action Lawsuit against Gilead regarding Remdesivir. I’m going to pass this info on to the attorneys.
I have passed a link to this post on to Greg Glaser, my lead counsel on the Control Group lawsuit. He is also general counsel the Physicians for Informed Consent. If he is not positioned to consider this, he may know who is.
Godspeed, Joy
God Bless you Joy! I don't have to be the one to carry the football across the goal line, but I have information and a website and dashboards that are court room ready for anybody who wants to try! God Bless
God bless you for fighting. If the lawyers can have some $$ (damages) to get to, it really helps. The enemy needs to be hit in the wallet, HARD. Positioning the correct defendants will be key. You've done incredible work so far.
Jeff Childers may have some suggestions, he writes C&C substack, he’s a lawyer in Florida
For sure CDC throttling and scrubbing data on VAERS is a deliberate fraud and dereliction of duty under many federal laws. Trouble is it's hard to overcome sovereign immunity and the military prototype contracts shielding the jab manufacturers with their bags of unlabeled jab ingredients coming from heaven knows where. And using the US military data is hard given so many laws allowing secrecy there. But going after "informed consent" for "human subject experiments" on "civilians" is easier.
It's going to take a Nuremberg type crimes versus humanity or an uninformed consent lawsuit on existing federal human subject medical experiment laws to nail any individual people in government or corporations to make any one person go to jail or pay cash damages. Anyone who got a jab at any time without full informed consent should have standing in court to nail those in government who authorized and those in corporations who also did this horrible human medical experiment. All those blank vial package paper inserts and the fraudulent VAERS data were all **intended** to deceive the public.
Have a look at these laws:
-- US Federal Code of Regulations (administrative law)
https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/45-cfr-46/index.html
-- That code's enabling statute from Congress (Congressional law)
42 US Code Chap 6A, Subchap 3, Part H, Sections 289 - 290a
Look close at this section on IRBs:
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2014-title42/html/USCODE-2014-title42-chap6A-subchapIII-partH-sec289.htm
So far l've not seen anywhere any details of any IRB used to authorized mass public use of any of the jabs nor one seated after a human subject makes a formal request for one to review individual harm. Perhaps not one harmed victim or their executor after death has asked so far for an IRB to sit and review any human subject complaints as part of the first step of administrative oversight before a victim or his/her legal representative files a civl or criminal legal case.
Long ago, I used these IRB laws when I was harmed by a human medical experiment at a major university. The university's IRB met in a seedy trailer and after taking my testimony ordered the graduate student researcher to pay me in full the offered fee to human subjects after I'd left half way through the experiment appalled to discover he was a callous idiot dunderhead who thought nothing of doing outrageous physical harm to me without my consent.
USA law **allows** human medical experimenters to do harm without prior consent by the human guinea pigs if an IRB **ahead** of time thinks that is OK in the search for medical knowledge. But, that work-around is outrageous, frequently abused, usually done mby in IRB pencil-whipping not meeting in person to discuss it, but that process leaves a very useful paper trail with names and dataes of who did that criminal outrage.
The standing and appointed IRBs all know very well most humans agree to medical research for sheep-like altruistic reasons and the IRBs take advantage of that recklessly. In my case, it was a chaplain sitting on my IRB panel who was the **only** one with a shred of human care. The rest were all medical and PhD doctors who looked at me as if I was a fungible piece of stupid meat to be used and abused at their whims. But, once I told them to their faces in the seedy trailer I was a lawyer they were scared s---less. I told them I did my own legal research in their own university medical library. They were lucky I did not file a criminal assault & battery case with our local police and sheriff, and then a civil damages lawsuit.
My big legal question today is were the jab IRBs pre-jab use in experiments Summer 2020 and/or after the mass jab rollout when the jabs were legally still experimental civilian or military panels? If the latter, did Trump or Biden sign a posse comitatus declaration to be able to impose martial law on unwitting civilians?
How about Paul Davis, Attorney in Texas?
Do you know how I can get a hold of his office? What town is he in?
https://renz-law.com/contact/
https://tomrenz.com/
https://www.barneslawllp.com/
Are you familiar with Tom Renz? Check out his substack . He maybe available to help.
Way to go on the warpath, Albert! Now you're a "legal eagle" as well! Good for you! I believe there are a lot more ways to skin a cat than we think, especially when fraud is involved. God bless you for what you're doing !
Wow you are such an honourable and good man! I pray connections will appear and all your incredible work will be taken even higher. Thank you!
“that were unavoidable”
My mom is one of the two plaintiffs listed on the Class Action Lawsuit against Gilead regarding Remdesivir. I’m going to pass this info on to the attorneys.
Very Good, I'm listening to Brad Geyer speak right now on our zoom now...