The expiry dates for Yellow Dot Lots show they were mostly buffered with Tromethamine and this buffer was substituted without trial. Did this change reduce overall toxicity? What were the total Doses manufactured and actually dispensed of all lots?
No, I don't know any EUDRA people. I know Brian in that we have communicated to get some of my work published on his site. All my stuff has been from VAERS, and whatever else I can "iframe" into my site from other sites. Since I can't afford the $900/yr single user license from Tableau to build a dashboard properly, in the sense of residing on my own dedicated equipment and multi-user access, etc.. I use Tableau's Public area which means I have almost all functionality, but the data saved on their servers and published in their public domain. I then iframe that dashboard into my site. It's better than all others because of all the data fields, coupled with medalerts or authenticating purposes, we can keep track of everything. So if the obfuscation is going on here, it's going on everywhere. Like different feathers of the same bird.
Dear Welcome the Eagle, nanotechnology is time and dose dependent. A small dose after a long time can be more toxic than a large dose after a short time.... Which means there is no placebo, it's just a matter of time, dose and type of materials used.
Biological effects of tailor-made multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) without functionalization were investigated in vivo in a two-year carcinogenicity study.
Yeah I'll say I took on the Denmark Study and went further and deeper than the original authors did. Plus I made a little Interactive Dashboard to boot.
I know your stacks are important, but as a slow reader and trying to keep a breast of way tooooooooooo many pieces of the agenda puzzle afoot, I seek out summary points.
The expiry dates for Yellow Dot Lots show they were mostly buffered with Tromethamine and this buffer was substituted without trial. Did this change reduce overall toxicity? What were the total Doses manufactured and actually dispensed of all lots?
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/urgent-please-remove-all-reference
I take it all your data is from VAERS?
Are you in touch with the (unnamed) source of EUDRA data that Brian Shilhavy has at VaccineImpact/Health Impact News?
https://vaccineimpact.com/2023/50663-dead-and-5315063-injured-following-covid-19-vaccines-in-european-database-of-adverse-reactions/
All the links are now 404 not founds.
I have (months ago) tried to get the data in the format presented from the EMA - the database is a pig (oracle I think).
No, I don't know any EUDRA people. I know Brian in that we have communicated to get some of my work published on his site. All my stuff has been from VAERS, and whatever else I can "iframe" into my site from other sites. Since I can't afford the $900/yr single user license from Tableau to build a dashboard properly, in the sense of residing on my own dedicated equipment and multi-user access, etc.. I use Tableau's Public area which means I have almost all functionality, but the data saved on their servers and published in their public domain. I then iframe that dashboard into my site. It's better than all others because of all the data fields, coupled with medalerts or authenticating purposes, we can keep track of everything. So if the obfuscation is going on here, it's going on everywhere. Like different feathers of the same bird.
Dear Welcome the Eagle, nanotechnology is time and dose dependent. A small dose after a long time can be more toxic than a large dose after a short time.... Which means there is no placebo, it's just a matter of time, dose and type of materials used.
Please take a look at this study:
https://particleandfibretoxicology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12989-014-0059-z The carcinogenic effect of various multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) after intraperitoneal injection in rats | Particle and Fibre Toxicology | Full Text (biomedcentral.com)
Biological effects of tailor-made multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) without functionalization were investigated in vivo in a two-year carcinogenicity study.
https://outraged.substack.com/p/evidence-of-crimes-against-humanity https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/synthetic-biology-cross-domain-bacteria
I cannot possibly read everything, but I've tried to capture all opinions re this yellow dot lot situation here:
https://totalityofevidence.com/what-is-in-the-covid-19-vaccines/
Yeah I'll say I took on the Denmark Study and went further and deeper than the original authors did. Plus I made a little Interactive Dashboard to boot.
I know your stacks are important, but as a slow reader and trying to keep a breast of way tooooooooooo many pieces of the agenda puzzle afoot, I seek out summary points.
Do you have a summary video for the "lay person"?
And link to your dashboard.
I'm a bit overwhelmed ATM!
No not really, but here is a link to my dashboard: https://www.vaersaware.com/c19-only
As always, cool calm and collected analysis - thank you 😊🙏
Thank you.
Thanks for this