P5: New Zealand's Whistleblower Data/Validations
Putting some clarity in place
Part 4 HERE. Dashboard HERE
It’s been confirmed by my Yoda “Wayne” from vaersanalysis.info the straight up data stud. This is all the confirmation I need and with my own validations as I ran through each of my dashboard’s filters to make sure everything was modeled, imported and massaged correctly. My one disclaimer is there seems to be a tiny variance of about a hundred people’s reports that have a small fluctuation in the data like date of birth or age? Meaning there must be a few victims with multiple jab dates but there age is not exactly the same on each jab date? Example, the person was 59yrs old on first jab, then 60yrs old on second jab. This person would flush out twice depending on the query by age category. Other than that the data is tight.
I make the hamster wheels, I don’t run on them, but I’ll keep making this dashboard better. However using the population counts I got a couple days ago from populationpyramid.net it said there was 7,314 Kiwis’ that are 95-99yrs old yet the data says there were 7,771 jabbed? I hope you can see that at row 21, columns B & C.
This data does not seem to represent the younger population very well? I’ve already heard various explanations of why the data may be incomplete, but it seems like the conversation starts at 37,315 dead and only goes up from there. There is 197 dead Kiwis’ in VAERS for C19 jabs and a Harvard Pilgrim Study URF of 100x would put us at 19,700 dead.
If ~4,000,000 people really took a jab with 37,315 deaths then we are saying about 1 out of every 107.2 people died from the de-pop shot? When it feels like a third of the people are gone, we’ll know Jesus will be coming quickly. Until then, God Bless You.
~18% (6,820) of all deaths happened a year or later after victims last vax. I don’t know what that means and it’s only an observation. It’s definitely not a shape that resembles VAERS. I think it could be if our pharmacovigilance system was more diligent.
Support The Eagle! Pretty please. God Bless
I don't see the NZ government denying the validity of this record-level data. Their only response is to arrest the whistleblower and state that it's "dangerous" for us to see the truth.
Birthdays may explain some of the age differences found, also untrained people in POP UP tent jab centres (not nurses) may have recorded birth date details incorrectly. May also explain the difference in the population 95-99 jab numbers .