I don't see the NZ government denying the validity of this record-level data. Their only response is to arrest the whistleblower and state that it's "dangerous" for us to see the truth.
Birthdays may explain some of the age differences found, also untrained people in POP UP tent jab centres (not nurses) may have recorded birth date details incorrectly. May also explain the difference in the population 95-99 jab numbers .
Brilliant! In the data the DOB and the age are given (two columns). However I didn’t calculate those myself. I will audit those myself and let my software calculate what the age should be and see if I can find errors?? However if there was an database error before or during extraction I would expect lots of adults getting pediatric jabs and vice versa. Thanks Wendy for helping me out! I get so focused I forget to think outside the box a little. You think like an auditor thinks!
Indeed, it stands to reason that in the mass vaccination centers some recording would have had some errors.
Personal anecdote: One of my relatives was among the very first to rush out and get jabbed. Walgreen's (in the US) gave that first jab, but then when my relative went to take a second jab, no record of that first jab came up on Walgreen's computer systems. Trying to sort this out, my relative visited two different Walgreen's and also called the Walgreen's 1 800 number twice. Nothing could be done; they had no record of the jab, so that was that. Needing the then-definition of "fully vaccinated" documents for travel, and trusting that the jabs were fully safe and effective, my relative took an extra jab just to have that piece of paper and associated QR code showing the two (but in fact three) jabs.
People were questioning the completeness of the data and supposedly ~4m took the jab in NZ, so even at the high end it's still an atrocity and rising...
The reason for the discrepancy in ages is probably the method that was used to obfuscate the data. Kirsch said: "We have the original data. It's been anonymized so we don't run into any privacy issues or HIPAA violations. But it's been anonymized in a way that we maintain the statistical fidelity of the data. In other words we time-shifted all of the dates relative to each other, but the dates relative to each other are the same. We just shifted them slightly in time so that you can still do the statistical analysis without violating anyone's privacy." [https://banned.video/watch?id=656a5c4e0681e68064e50415, time 14:25]
In February 2023, Kirsch wrote a Substack post where he requested people to release record-level vaccination data, and he even provided instructions on how to format the data, which matches the format of the CSV file that Barry Young gave to Kirsch. [https://kirschsubstack.com/p/a-worldwide-call-for-data-transparency] But in the post he also wrote: "Before publicly releasing the records, you obfuscate them using a method that is deterministic on a per record basis so that all the dates of a given person’s records are consistently time shifted."
The obfuscation procedure probably also explains why there's a slightly higher number of vaccines given on weekends than weekdays, and why a time series plot of vaccine doses given per day looks like a smoothed average of real vaccination data: https://mongol-fi.github.io/moar.html#Distribution_of_vaccine_doses_given_per_day.
THERES ONLY ONE COMMON THREAD... WHEN IT COMES TO THESE DIABOLICAL INJECTIONS THEY FALSELY CLAIM TO BE VACCINES - DEATH DEATH AND MORE DEATH. A LOT MORE TO COME , THESE FIGURES WILL PALE INTO INSIGNIFICANCE IN THE NEXT 5 TO 12 MONTHS. WATCH THIS SPACE. DEATH DEATH DEATH IS WHAT CAN BE DEDUCED FROM THESE SHOTS....NOTHING ELSE
I don't see the NZ government denying the validity of this record-level data. Their only response is to arrest the whistleblower and state that it's "dangerous" for us to see the truth.
Birthdays may explain some of the age differences found, also untrained people in POP UP tent jab centres (not nurses) may have recorded birth date details incorrectly. May also explain the difference in the population 95-99 jab numbers .
Brilliant! In the data the DOB and the age are given (two columns). However I didn’t calculate those myself. I will audit those myself and let my software calculate what the age should be and see if I can find errors?? However if there was an database error before or during extraction I would expect lots of adults getting pediatric jabs and vice versa. Thanks Wendy for helping me out! I get so focused I forget to think outside the box a little. You think like an auditor thinks!
Indeed, it stands to reason that in the mass vaccination centers some recording would have had some errors.
Personal anecdote: One of my relatives was among the very first to rush out and get jabbed. Walgreen's (in the US) gave that first jab, but then when my relative went to take a second jab, no record of that first jab came up on Walgreen's computer systems. Trying to sort this out, my relative visited two different Walgreen's and also called the Walgreen's 1 800 number twice. Nothing could be done; they had no record of the jab, so that was that. Needing the then-definition of "fully vaccinated" documents for travel, and trusting that the jabs were fully safe and effective, my relative took an extra jab just to have that piece of paper and associated QR code showing the two (but in fact three) jabs.
Wow! This is crowd sourcing at its finest! See my response to Wendy. Thanks Transcriber!
Thank you. You wrote "If ~4,000,000 people really took a jab with 37,315 deaths..." but you also said there are 2,215,729 people in the dataset?
People were questioning the completeness of the data and supposedly ~4m took the jab in NZ, so even at the high end it's still an atrocity and rising...
Thank you very much.
Barry/Draven said his data came from the “Pay per dose ” system.
The page below provided some good info on this system:
https://www.voicesforfreedom.co.nz/blog/missing-data-explained/
P.S. I think you are wonderfully kind, thank you.
The reason for the discrepancy in ages is probably the method that was used to obfuscate the data. Kirsch said: "We have the original data. It's been anonymized so we don't run into any privacy issues or HIPAA violations. But it's been anonymized in a way that we maintain the statistical fidelity of the data. In other words we time-shifted all of the dates relative to each other, but the dates relative to each other are the same. We just shifted them slightly in time so that you can still do the statistical analysis without violating anyone's privacy." [https://banned.video/watch?id=656a5c4e0681e68064e50415, time 14:25]
In February 2023, Kirsch wrote a Substack post where he requested people to release record-level vaccination data, and he even provided instructions on how to format the data, which matches the format of the CSV file that Barry Young gave to Kirsch. [https://kirschsubstack.com/p/a-worldwide-call-for-data-transparency] But in the post he also wrote: "Before publicly releasing the records, you obfuscate them using a method that is deterministic on a per record basis so that all the dates of a given person’s records are consistently time shifted."
The obfuscation procedure probably also explains why there's a slightly higher number of vaccines given on weekends than weekdays, and why a time series plot of vaccine doses given per day looks like a smoothed average of real vaccination data: https://mongol-fi.github.io/moar.html#Distribution_of_vaccine_doses_given_per_day.
THERES ONLY ONE COMMON THREAD... WHEN IT COMES TO THESE DIABOLICAL INJECTIONS THEY FALSELY CLAIM TO BE VACCINES - DEATH DEATH AND MORE DEATH. A LOT MORE TO COME , THESE FIGURES WILL PALE INTO INSIGNIFICANCE IN THE NEXT 5 TO 12 MONTHS. WATCH THIS SPACE. DEATH DEATH DEATH IS WHAT CAN BE DEDUCED FROM THESE SHOTS....NOTHING ELSE
Thank you
Maybe none of the vax sites the data came from were pediatricians offices. Thats where most young people probably got their shots.