Cool, and understood. It was good work on you and Arkmedic's part. Took me a second and with a little help from Mongol's explanation to visualize in my head... same victim multiple dob's. Once I got the scent, I just go on a little hunt. God Bless
They used Paper records, some older people were residents of care homes and dates were easily mistaken as groups got jabbed at once multiple times, added to that many care home workers are now immigrants whose first language is not English. Typos and bad handwriting could account for mistakes. Then data input by an operator who consistently types 89/99 as an error is possible. the 50 year one could be explained by double 9 /double 4 error. Overall the errors are small in the big picture
Hi Albert,
These two lines are from Ark' & myself, I'm afraid Igor bears no responsibility in these.
We just underlined that Igor had highlighted other data integrity issues in his own article.
Carry on the good work.
Cool, and understood. It was good work on you and Arkmedic's part. Took me a second and with a little help from Mongol's explanation to visualize in my head... same victim multiple dob's. Once I got the scent, I just go on a little hunt. God Bless
They used Paper records, some older people were residents of care homes and dates were easily mistaken as groups got jabbed at once multiple times, added to that many care home workers are now immigrants whose first language is not English. Typos and bad handwriting could account for mistakes. Then data input by an operator who consistently types 89/99 as an error is possible. the 50 year one could be explained by double 9 /double 4 error. Overall the errors are small in the big picture
I agree errors are minuscule. I wish VAERS DATA was as good as this data is.