Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Joy Lucette Garner's avatar

It was established back in 2010 that less than 1% of all ACTUAL (documented) vaccine injuries are ever reported to VAERS. And since then, VAERS has done thing but implement systems and strategies that would further reduce the % of actual vaccine injuries that would end up being reported. SEE: https://digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/electronic-support-public-health-vaccine-adverse-event-reporting-system

Even before you begin to cite how many are deleted (of the "less than 1% that are ever reported to VAERS in the first place) one must first begin by multiplying/calibrating the published VAERS numbers by at least 100 times before you're even in the neighborhood of anything close to the truth.

The 2010 study of the VAERS system proved that vaccine injuries are "common" and that "less than 1% of vaccine injuries" are ever reported to VAERS in the 1st place. VAERS exists to launder the dead bodies so that the money made off of them doesn't need to be laundered. Although it is admitted that VAERS is only supposed to serve as a sort of "sample" to provide safety "signals" our "scientists" represent the VAERS numbers as a TOTAL for injuries in order to prop up their "rare" slogan, which is then used to prop up their "safe" slogan.

They have no valid "science" (or numbers) to support their marketing slogans. The evidence proves that vaccine injuries (including deaths) have always been extremely COMMON, not "rare". Even an Oxford study was forced to admit that close to 80% of the deaths occurring after vaccination are within the first 24 hours of being jabbed.

Expand full comment
Ron1234's avatar

I suspect that the throttling efforts are widespread, but with the primary focus on number of deaths. That's why the method I've used to estimate underreporting focuses on deaths. While the numbers of specific diseases can be argued because of assignment problems, that is not the case with deaths. Someone could classify myocarditis as pericarditis, but that misclassification would not occur with deaths. You either die or you don't!

My method takes the ratio of 1) deaths expected to 2) the fraction of VAERS deaths that fall into the expected category, then multiplies the non-expected segment of VAERS deaths by that ratio. The more throttling by the criminals who "manage" VAERS, the higher the ratio. With my method, they don't escape. The detailed methodology can be found here (https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/underreporting-factors-for-vaers-are-vastly-underreported-e3a21062).

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts