Jeff Childers Gets Tricky Question about Vaccine Liability Protection!

WelcomeTheEagle asks Jeff and Steve a tricky question...

Here’s the 3min Q&A: Would deleting (legitimate) DEAD Pfizer Trial victims from VAERS be grounds to repeal liability protection established in the 1986 ACT?

Here’s a couple things to notice before you hit that play button. Notice Steve gets a little smile when he hears my name (WelcomeTheEagle)… that’s good! I gotta admit I do have a sense of pride watching Stevie do his thing. He found me pretty early into the plandemic I’d say about April of 2021. If you see my Bitchute channel, I had already put out a hundred videos by then and that’s not including all my Youtube videos I put out through 2020 when I was stalking the hospitalization stats of my local county (Santa Clara). I was so mad when Youtube blew up my channel, I think I had a couple thousands subs.

The other thing to watch for is how Jeff had to think about the question, and he looked upwards in thought? No matter his ultimate response, I think you saw a seed being sewn into Jeff the idea about what happens when fraud is being perpetrated by the governmental side of things with respects to 1986 ACT?

Post Video Observations:

• Lisa Laehy did a great job moderating and is right on point with what I was trying to convey. She even threw out the perfect word “collusion” as in what if there is collusion between the manufacturer and the CDC/FDA, the government by extension? That’s exactly what’s going on and we all know it.

• Childers try’s to get clarification by asking if VAERS is deleting currently, or deleting them prior to releasing the original clinic trial results?

  * This is a great initial question and very important to understand the

  timeline. In this case VAERS is deleting “currently”, or on May 28th 2021

  and in the sense that it was AFTER the clinical trial results! However,

  because this is a trial patient it during the trial period and per the VAERS

  report this 51yo female was jabbed October 1, 2020. There is another clue

  that patient had lab results on the day she died (4/21/2021) and Pfizer’s own

  time stamp (USPFIZER INC2021482196) indicates records are in their

  possession in April and cross walked to VAERS on May 5th and finalized

  two days later on May 7th. Published for world to see May 14th. VAERS

  finalized DELETION of report on May 28th (Memorial Day Weekend) and

  removed report on publications to world June 4, 2021.

  

  * Childers at this point heads down a wrong thought process by deducing, “if

  info was falsified that was provided to the FDA…” This is a death, they probably

  did not want to falsify a death? This is a trial victim so I will assume victim

  was under the best observation procedures possible. Per the very detailed

  report and family members, someone died!? We are talking about VAERS

  fraudulently deleting a legitimate death report that happens to be a death of

  a trial victim, but died after the EUA approval and after initial rollout.

• Childers immediately gets back on track stating, “whoever the manufacturers are…? As in DARPA? The DOD? The Government?

• Childer’s says “You can’t sue the government..”

• Kirsch interjects, “The liability protection is for the manufacturer…”

• Childer’s adds, “The governments protection comes from something called Qualified Immunity where employees are not liable in their ordinary job description, but if they go outside their ordinary job description…”

• WelcomeTheEagle is thinking, like fraud or breaking law? Is their a word salad here like under EUA we can break the law?

  Before we get to far down the rabbit hole, here is the actual report again:

  

  Let’s re-visit 300aa-23 (d)(2A) No Punitive damages UNLESS manufacturer engaged in FRAUD.

  

  Now let’s re-visit 300aa-27 (a)(2) The Secretary shall assure improvements in… ADVERSE REACTION REPORTING…!!!!!

  

  This should be it in this section 300aa-27. What am I missing here? Is it the manufacturers obligation to maintain or “assure” the adverse reaction reporting system is working correctly or improved upon where ever possible?

  As a side note, we can run analysis showing the system has been maintained orders of magnitude WORSE, by the amount of reports that have been deleted, the amount of missing data and empty fields like lot#’s, age fields, state locations, the purposeful delay in publication, etc. Nothing has been improved upon it has actually gotten worse compared to historical data in VAERS!!

  Let’s get back to Childers and Kirsch. I generally like these guys, but do you think either of them have really examined this 1986 ACT especially this one part that seems to obligate the Secretary of Health? Is that Xavier Becerra now? I mean Becerra is just a pharma shill puppet, but this part of the 1986 ACT looks like the governments obligation to make sure everybody is following the rules? Why does this stupid ACT mention anything the Secretary or the government has to do, if there is nothing we can do because some supposed understanding or technicality about this being liability protection for the manufacturer? This really feels like the manufactures and big pharma is our government now? The fox is guarding the hen house.

  This feels like insanity…

  Here’s part 1 HERE.

  VSRF HERE.

  Covid & Coffee (Childers) HERE.

  

  click to launch