Don't mind Janssen & VAERS, they are just scrubbing the system!

What's the definition of social media?

Consider this rant part 2 of my last blurb about VAERS mass deleting 750 reports, which you can easily analyze for yourself HERE.

So we left off identifying Janssen (J&J) as being the manufacturer soup du jour in this weeks mass deletion with 544 of 750 reports, 125 of which were Janssen death reports! Now a big shout out to main man Wayne over at vaersanalysis.info for giving me a heads up and the skinny, it looks like the VAERS folks were zeroing in on reports that were coming in or through “social media”. It would have taken me longer to find that correlation, but between the small army of citizen sleuths who actually work together, we make a formidable team. Gracias Wayne.

So now this is what this weeks deleted reports look like with the word “social media” in the summary narrative write-up:

Hubba hubba, now we are getting somewhere! In case you didn’t know I have a filter for symptom text that acts like “contain”, like show me all reports that contain the word(s) “social media”.

So now lets get down to brass tacks and show you me in auditing mode, which is slightly different than the dump and pump method of analyzing aka dump and count.

Here are five examples of these deleted deaths the the words “social media” . I wanted to give you an honest cross cut, that’s why I included report# 2. It’s ID# 1345770 just click and launch to actual Medalerts report. I think it should not be in VAERS, I spotted this report that day it was published back on Jun4th, 2021 and mentioned it before, I think I mentioned it around here in my Bitchute archive click image:

The philosophical debate about this report is it was actually crossed walked from Pfizer, then to Janssen, then forwarded to VAERS. VAERS received and finalized to publish within 3 days. When did the rigorous authentication process take place? These manufacturers know every minute detail about their jabs, they probably even know what the victims had for breakfast, but let’s play along. Ok, so it passes the sniff test at the manufacturer level and is punted to VAERS. Did VAERS ask Janssen what’s up? Did this come from a huge hospital chain? A big lab like Lab Corp or Quest, or my old stomping grounds Bio-Reference Labs? No, they did whatever they do and quickly punted to the public, probably knowing full well they’ll circle back eventually and delete it under some other pretense. The social media aspect is secondary in my opinion considering how many official hands and vetting processes it had to go through to get to the peasants.

A last word on report #2 and it’s Split_Type field alpha numeric time stamp USJNJFOC20210541733. You can clearly see the year, and in this case I will tell you the “5” is the month and the rest of the numbers could be how many total reports came in for that month either 41,733 or 1,733? I’ll tie together why I mention it shortly.

Moving onto report #5… here it is (clickable):

A physician via a company rep (Janssen) via social media? Did the physician use a computer to convey the death to Janssen, is that what social media means in this context? They certainly knew the vax date month (Mar-2021) and grandpa was 70yrs old from Idaho. The lack on guidance about boosting tells me his death was in the part of the scam when they weren’t really talking about boosting yet, and this guy died at least 14 days after his hot dose (vaccine failure). Could be anywhere from late March to August 2021. I’ve ran my own audits on “lag” days between Janssen’s time stamp in split_type field to VAERS received date with all of their properly crosswalked reports ie- has at least vax date or more and discovered there is an average delay of about 60-80days. It looks like early on Janssen was in a pattern of submitting reports to VAERS WITHOUT the VAX DATE! Almost as if VAERS themselves scrubbed the vax date out to conceal backlogs? They’ve recently done a better job of getting vax dates in and sometimes onset dates on reports. It’s highly questionable because if you read those reports you can frequently deduce vax, onset, and death date timelines with the limited clues in the write-up.

Check out report #5 stacked by Janssen’s split_type time stamp order:

See the column titled Vax Date Cdc? That is telling me originally a vax date was not populated (null). I had to use the next best date methodology and at worse use the received date. It’s a small project upcoming to polish up some vax dates and set them back to that average of 60-80day lag delay I was talking about earlier. This is where I’ll circle back and re-mention about what I think the month number is? In this case 8 or August 2021.

Here is the next thing apart from the word “social media”, this was a 70 year old, male from Idaho, well let’s see how many 70 years olds died in Idaho with a Janssen shot?

Well that was easy, I didn’t even need to drill further for males that died in Mar-Aug 2021. I think we can reasonably deduce this wasn’t deleted because it was a duplicate?

Heck I only found two deaths in Idaho that had a UNK AGE regardless of manufacturer and they were both Pfizer, male and female, they are actually 82 & 86 year olds because it’s properly written in the write-up, the other clues are not even close to the guy I’m looking for! Somebody should FOIA this deleted report! Any takers, let me know and I’ll give you my special special reports, I’d bet the farm are not duplicates of fake/false reports. So VAERS couldn’t trace back to the physician who submitted the report? Lastly it took them forever to flush this report down the memory hole, as if they wanted to flush long after anybody ways looking. Citizen sleuths be damned, nobody can hear or see them? Social Media my ass! VAERS Management is using scams to cover other scams! That’s a little bit of the auditing I’m doing boys and girls… God Bless