How does one expose this Leviathan when it can erase everything? Where is the “alternet”? I’ve seen my friend’s music recordings erased from my own iTunes uploads and his commercial music presence globally erased in an instant for speaking the truth.
I’m hoping the data is like a carpet stain of truth that will keep reappearing in spite of their removal efforts. May your angels protect you and keep you safe to continue this work.
Thanks Dar! The truth can't be erased and it can't be hidden forever. I'm just patiently waiting for the attorneys to figure we can use VAERS as their own rope to hang big pharma/FDA/CDC with! I was listening to Aaron Siri say there was a narrow avenue to sue for fraud under the Prep Act, but then they still have the 1986 Act to fall back on? I guess more than anything we the people need to refuse shots at all costs. Even if good ones exist? I think that might be an oxymoron, but hopefully you catch my drift.
If you don't still see your report in the live data, it will be viewable in medalerts wayback machine and my dashboard. The bigger issue would be that it's officially deleted! If that's the case, we should call CHD, Siri, and Dell. It would be awesome to find as many people as we can that have had their reports wrongfully deleted. We can also tell through the medalerts wayback machine if VAERS has deleted data elements like symptoms or word phrases, they usually will delete entire reports when they do delete stuff. I definitely see them delete symptoms however...
660 that all include EJ0553 in some way but only through last Sept b/c I'm tied up laying some other foundations and nobody has been really utilizing my work there as a focus or I would have updated more recently.
433 are correctly entered in VAX_LOT. Another 149 were typos which my code corrected like 36 EJO553, 10 E50553 (closest match), 7 EJ0553-L450, 6 EJO 553, 5 EJOSS3 and so on.
It’s possible that a physician described this case in social media ( I.e., Twitter) and a company rep ( employee, sales rep) read it and reported it. Not sure why it would be deleted except that a valid case in drug safety requires an ‘identifiable’ reporter. If the physician ‘reported’ the death in social media, but used a screen name, he’s not identifiable. In other words, he can’t be contacted. Employees are obligated to report AEs if they come upon them, but the context must be identified( in this case, social media). Social media lends itself to reporting of false stories since many use screen names and can’t be contacted for verification, as others can who use phone or email to report. With social media identified as the source, you can put that report in context. Not sure why they would delete it entirely.
All valid points and very reasonable and fair, yet as in my example with the physician it passed through the manufacture and VAERS and onto the public without any due diligence seemingly. Due diligence on the SAE's they are suppose to scrutinize most! So they pooped the bed in the 4-6wk rigorous vetting process, and then let it sit in the public domain for close to 2yrs before ultimately deleting. They can't find a physician no less, and presumably with an army of General Dynamics folks? I'm not giving these guys an escape hatch, they do a sub par job on purpose looking for ways to keep the safe & effective narrative going.
Employees must report to their safety team and many companies will still report ‘invalid’ cases ( i.e. unidentified reporter) to the agency, to be conservative. If it’s electronic reporting to VAERS ( like FAERS), it may get ‘received’ without human review. BUT- I was not aware that agencies then delete cases that have been duly reported. This is disturbing.
How does one expose this Leviathan when it can erase everything? Where is the “alternet”? I’ve seen my friend’s music recordings erased from my own iTunes uploads and his commercial music presence globally erased in an instant for speaking the truth.
I’m hoping the data is like a carpet stain of truth that will keep reappearing in spite of their removal efforts. May your angels protect you and keep you safe to continue this work.
Thanks Dar! The truth can't be erased and it can't be hidden forever. I'm just patiently waiting for the attorneys to figure we can use VAERS as their own rope to hang big pharma/FDA/CDC with! I was listening to Aaron Siri say there was a narrow avenue to sue for fraud under the Prep Act, but then they still have the 1986 Act to fall back on? I guess more than anything we the people need to refuse shots at all costs. Even if good ones exist? I think that might be an oxymoron, but hopefully you catch my drift.
The battle is won when people say NO. See TARGET store collapse……
I'd like to see what data they are trying to srub from mine?
If you don't still see your report in the live data, it will be viewable in medalerts wayback machine and my dashboard. The bigger issue would be that it's officially deleted! If that's the case, we should call CHD, Siri, and Dell. It would be awesome to find as many people as we can that have had their reports wrongfully deleted. We can also tell through the medalerts wayback machine if VAERS has deleted data elements like symptoms or word phrases, they usually will delete entire reports when they do delete stuff. I definitely see them delete symptoms however...
I was trying to search your website for EJ0553 or EJ0553Z the other day, but could not work out how to proceed. Have you posted about this Pfizer Lot?
No, but here is some stats on it: https://imgur.com/gallery/Sd4PvE7
https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?TABLE=ON&GROUP1=CAT&EVENTS=ON&VAXLOT=EJ0553
also, I would have bundled the EJ0553Z into EJ0553
Great, thanks very much
660 that all include EJ0553 in some way but only through last Sept b/c I'm tied up laying some other foundations and nobody has been really utilizing my work there as a focus or I would have updated more recently.
https://hawkvaers.com/download/z_etc/EJ0553.csv
433 are correctly entered in VAX_LOT. Another 149 were typos which my code corrected like 36 EJO553, 10 E50553 (closest match), 7 EJ0553-L450, 6 EJO 553, 5 EJOSS3 and so on.
Others have EJ0553 in the writeups.
There's also this one, died and deleted:
https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=1064933&WAYBACKHISTORY=ON
Thanks very much, most useful.
"Hawk" is a great tech guy, very savvy!
It’s possible that a physician described this case in social media ( I.e., Twitter) and a company rep ( employee, sales rep) read it and reported it. Not sure why it would be deleted except that a valid case in drug safety requires an ‘identifiable’ reporter. If the physician ‘reported’ the death in social media, but used a screen name, he’s not identifiable. In other words, he can’t be contacted. Employees are obligated to report AEs if they come upon them, but the context must be identified( in this case, social media). Social media lends itself to reporting of false stories since many use screen names and can’t be contacted for verification, as others can who use phone or email to report. With social media identified as the source, you can put that report in context. Not sure why they would delete it entirely.
All valid points and very reasonable and fair, yet as in my example with the physician it passed through the manufacture and VAERS and onto the public without any due diligence seemingly. Due diligence on the SAE's they are suppose to scrutinize most! So they pooped the bed in the 4-6wk rigorous vetting process, and then let it sit in the public domain for close to 2yrs before ultimately deleting. They can't find a physician no less, and presumably with an army of General Dynamics folks? I'm not giving these guys an escape hatch, they do a sub par job on purpose looking for ways to keep the safe & effective narrative going.
Employees must report to their safety team and many companies will still report ‘invalid’ cases ( i.e. unidentified reporter) to the agency, to be conservative. If it’s electronic reporting to VAERS ( like FAERS), it may get ‘received’ without human review. BUT- I was not aware that agencies then delete cases that have been duly reported. This is disturbing.
They claim to delete duplicates
Then the original should be there. Apparently, it’s not
Proof they have no valid excuse for removing it.