14 Comments

I reported my adverse reaction in February 2021, it took 3 tries because the damn thing would time out and delete everything. By the 3rd try I prepared by cut/pasting all my data but even that was a race.

Clearly I didn’t read the fine print so I wasn’t aware of the the temp id bs. Plus, I got locked out of that email for some strange reason and have no way to obtain that information anymore.

I’m obviously alive and I’m still working but I truly feel my days are numbered because my whole body hurts ALL the time.

Expand full comment

Thanks for your hard work.

Expand full comment
author

Gracias

Expand full comment

The reporting system is so clearly rigged, your work has exposed more of their tricks.

The fact CDC didn't want to take up Harvards offer to improve the system in 2010 is the first clue. In the age of now AI their antiquated platform, with a huge govt budget is beyond criminal.

If your info can be used in court cases tgat would be helpful to shed some light.

But seems the only hope is to educated the normies...those that will listen. We need a clear and simple summary memes. What VAERS receives represents <1% (per Harvard 2010) of actual injuries. What CDC publishes is not even all of that 1% and when they do its likely been manipulated, so we can't even trust what they make public.

The fact that fields like "age " abd "died" are not populated for every report is telling especially when the info is within the "narrative" section. If thes are reviewed before publishing then the reviewer need the sack. Clearly thats by design.

Then there is date report received vs date CDC publish being months++ between, esp when it was a death. Sure way to hide a death cluster from the public. Throttling Albert calls this.

These are the things we need summary dot points of IMO. Hav you got that somewhere Albert?

I feel the authorities won't do anything to fix this, we have to make as many people aware as possible...we need simple toots to do this....maybe it is already somewhere and I've missed it.

Expand full comment
author

Ummm kind of but not really. I've list about 13 shimmey shams they pull in one of the first couple slides of my "powerpoint": https://www.vaersaware.com/my-powerpoint

I also have a kind of memes section: https://www.vaersaware.com/graphs-memes

Expand full comment
Jun 14·edited Jun 14Liked by Closed VAERS

Kudos and thank you for such excellent work, Welcome the Eagle.

Expand full comment
Jun 14Liked by Closed VAERS

Sure seems like a racketeering effort to me. I can see why you say some of the entries will have "eyes on" while most will not - and how that could be very useful for anyone trying to systematically cover up vax injury.

Expand full comment
Jun 14Liked by Closed VAERS

Eagle you do a great job

But there is nothing bombshell about CDC lying and obfuscation

Expand full comment
author

Agreed. I could show how VAERS deleted ~67 OPV death reports in one update in Dec 2009, when deaths meant something. They probably needed to pull the polio jab a lot longer than that, just shows you how long VAERS has been running cover for pharma and the money machine.

Expand full comment

Nothing new about this, but it made no difference, when I reported it in July, 2022, so I guess, it's never completely late. After November, 2021, they started to "doctor" data every Friday, but until then, "intent to harm" was easy to substantiate:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/proof-of-genocide

Expand full comment
Jun 14Liked by Closed VAERS

One cannot help but think that the VAERS system itself was designed to make it difficult to report possible side effects in the first place. Harvard's estimate in 2021 was that the actual number of side effects was on the order of 10 times that of VAERS.

https://medium.com/microbial-instincts/underreporting-and-post-vaccine-deaths-in-vaccine-adverse-event-reporting-system-vaers-explained-14fe22b2a65f

The actual number is likely to be much higher at present.

Expand full comment
author
Jun 15Liked by Closed VAERS

Well, the real number seems to be much more than 10 times.

Expand full comment
author

Yes and consider this, Lazarus report didn't have the paradigm shift we have today. Starting Jan 2011, only initial reports were made public, even though follow-up continues to be captured. During Lazarus era, VAERS was appending info with follow-up data like DEATH. Begs the question, how many people in VAERS are now since dead? I think we can take Steve Kirsch's 41X and double it based on this factoid alone.

Expand full comment