Are There 9 Million Reports Missing From VAERS?

A valid question from my friend Peter Halligan...

Evidence that nine million adverse events are missing from VAERS – and probably held on a “secret server” at the CDC – until the CDC pays General Dynamics IT more money

Peter has asked for my thoughts on this assertion, and my quick answer yes, and there probably should be more!

Here is the longer explanation:

There is much interpretation to phrase “missing from VAERS”. I think Peter is intending to convey that VAERS has received reports but has not published them yet and/or probably never will? I totally agree with assertion if that is Peter’s intent, moreover I even said first probably a couple years ago and hundreds of times since, VAERS DOES NOT PUBLISH ALL LEGITIMATE REPORTS RECEIVED!

In Peter’s deep dive article he’s calculating a reasonable amount of reports that should be cross-walked into VAERS from countries around the world, so it’s important to start with the official blurb about how, when, and why foreign reports should be crossed-walked into VAERS.

Subsidiaries, serious and unexpected? I figure the world is the pharma cartel’s subsidiary but there is probably some word salad in this definition to create an illusion that pharma doesn’t know what reports are being submitted directly to the pharmacovigilance databases directly by the peasants and hospitals around the world.

Is it “serious AND unexpected” or “serious OR unexpected”? Where is the product labeling? Does that Pfizer 5.3.6 document count with that ~1200 side effects? So anything outside of this list is unexpected? I have not been able to find a pattern in VAERS and it doesn’t make sense at least per this blub, why seemingly low level pure “administration errors” only reports also get crosswalked into VAERS? Here is just a few admin errors from foreign countries as proof:

Click to launch report

One thing my expert eyes is telling me for sure is the manufacturers for sure are throttling their submissions to VAERS. I use the word “crosswalk” because VAERS basically does no authentication or adjudication process for foreign reports. VAERS for all intents and purposes just receives and publishes quickly, no questions asked or additional info requested. This fact was revealed in Zack Stiebert’s (Epoch Times) FOIA documents also revealing General Dynamics $40M contract with VAERS.

The backlog, not publishing reports, throttling reports, and this GDIT contract scam was one of my very first Substacks in fact:

The one other layer of complexity I want to throw in is VSAFE. VSAFE has 10M reports, and only about ~36,000 reports are associated with VAERS, so for all intents and purposes again, this is a whole separate set of “domestic” victims. It’s not intended nor available for the foreign victims. It’s too simplistic to think that if VSAFE was never created there would be an additional 10M people in VAERS. It’s clear to me there is about 3M people in VAERS who were just participating in a survey with not apparent initial injuries. However those other 6-7M people definitely got pinched by the jab in varying degrees, up to death. So how many of these victims did VSAFE run interference on?

Theoretically tacking on hundreds of thousands of reports, even a couple million reports to VAERS and applying a Under Reporting Factoring of 30 or 40 or 100 makes this a scary proposition. It makes Peter Halligan’s assertion very reasonable in fact. I say YES Pete your assertions is conservative. No matter how we skin this cat, via Rancourt, Halligan, or The Eagle’s technique we keep arriving at similar mind boggling numbers!

This whole plandemic scam, the unicorn vaccines, the hospital death protocols, the infertility, the mental health suicides and suffering, I wouldn’t be surprised if the cabal hasn’t shaved off a billion souls by now already. God help us. Get right with Jesus folks, because one way or another he is coming or you are going to him for judgement.

Don’t forget even Bobby knows VAERS “disappears” reports:

Click to launch