What do you know about VAERS Death Dates?
What do you know about VAERS Death Dates?
7,394 have a UNK Death Date? Not so fast Grasshopper!
Not so fast grasshopper, let me explain my Aztec math in the image above. Reading thousands of reports, measuring lag days between receive, vax, onset, publish and using a little bit of the razzle dazzle you will find at least ~3,200 reports where death date was explained. You can figure out when the death occurred or at least within a reasonable time frame, with outliers being at least within the same month or within a few week window. When VAERS is taking 400, 500, 600 days to publish a report I won’t lament to much that I only know the death was within a 3-4week window. Many Hundreds if not a thousand reports had the actual death date documented in summary narrative, yet date was not populated in the “Date died” field.
Here is what all grasshoppers and space cadets will see that do not follow VaersAware:
Domestic vs Foreign:
I still hope to squeeze out a few hundred more death dates of the remaining ~4,000, many take close reading and a date calculating website like timeanddate.com to make a determination. I’m sure a natural learning algorithm would be useful but stuff still needs to be double checked. Some times the old Aztec wax on wax off method is best. The results of this exercise has now produced a stunning discovery for me, it probably was already there but I now have a higher level of confidence VAERS is throttling deaths and here it is.:
A few things are curious, first is the spike in jab uptake between Oct21 to ~Jan16 does not really appear in the actual death dates? The 2nd and 3rd waves of uptake hasn’t revealed themselves either? That 3rd wave starting around October 2022 coincides with 5-11yrs getting approved for extinction, oops I mean sterilization, oops I mean inoculation, oops I mean shorter hospitalization time.
The other realization about the remaining 3,000 - 4,000 deaths is that these deaths could be severely throttled reports and/or deaths could have happened at any point during this depop vaccine rollout and/or at minimum a week before report was published? Why should we give the CDC/FDA any benefit of the doubt now? I wouldn’t doubt at least half of my 1,383 figure is severely throttled reports. The masters of manipulation are looking out for our best interests? Ok
UK jab to injury report spikes did correspondent coming in at an at a glance 1 or 2 week window. However it was definitely strange before then. The boosters came out on 1st Oct AFAIK, but there was dead silence from the regulatory agency until November on report numbers. They then produced, however what was shown in the split was an absurdity. Non boosters (child jabs at that stage) were outnumbering injury reports for the elderly despite the elderly being injured on jab 1 and 2 the most. The child jabs were probably also a slower rollout at this time. There was also talk of a vaccine administered dataset being late for "presentation reasons". It was all very very strange.
I think you need to break things down by age — the death rate is highly peaked towards the elderly, but uptake also has an age dependence. For example mandates being enacted forced more of the working age to get the shots later, while the more vulnerable elderly would have been hit early.