VAERS has moved backed to publishing “new” reports monthly. It is quite arbitrary and really disingenuous CDC/FDA chose to revert back to their pre-plandemic routine considering this is suppose to be considered a early warning system. Quite understandable and expected when you realize VAERS is just big pharma’s lap dog running cover for their master. Let’s just get to auditing…
Deleted Reports:
The “Deleted Reports” dashboard as I stated in my last article shows all 25 DEATHS were Covid depop jab deletions, 5 from UNK domestic, 5 from foreign countries, 3 from California, and 1’s & 2’s from other states. A few more details in my last article HERE.
The egregious part of these deleted reports is 1) Many “live” duplicate twin reports can not be located, if they were deleted for being “duplicate”. 2) Many if not all are NOT fake or false reports? See this example:
Oh My Goodness, this looks like a physician who filed a death report for his/her colleague who became the submitter’s patient! DEAD DOCTOR ALERT! No age, no state, no vax date, no death date, no lot#, and published super fast on initial submission. VAERS could have held the report an extra week to obtain the missing information from the manufacturer, you would think? Not if VAERS is running cover for big pharma! You are getting bamboozled folks, on top of letting the report sit for a year before needing to delete the report? Nobody is really looking anyways except The Eagle.
Here is a example of down-coding a death report:
It’s a little tricky to see but #ID 1769852 was originally a death from Iceland (country code: IS) published late 2021, and now two years later VAERS found the need to down-code the report? Technically this fetus didn’t make it, and probably not considered a fetal demise because the baby didn’t make it into the 20th week of life? This Birth Defect is brutal but at least at this designation it is still considered a serious adverse event. Most miscarriages are office visits and “None of Above” or a.k.a. not serious, also known as safe and effective.
The other two up-coded deaths are ID# 941999 and ID# 1257420 and again it begs the question why did it take well over two years to finally figure out these victims actually died? This is all about the THROTTLE game folks, every move is in favor of big pharma and not the citizens who fund this whole shit show.
Live Reports:
The “new” death reports for covid19 officially shows 201 “new” deaths but it was actually 202 because they up-coded two and down-coded one previously published death. Here is the summary of all 13,936 + 3 (upcoded & downcoded deaths) reports.
All Deaths Only:
Covid19 only (Tot: 205) is 2021 (28) , 2022 (49), 2023 (93), UNK (35)
There is many notable observations in the reports, but death in particular, are the 38 coming from Tennessee alone. My friends at the TN Liberty Network will be getting their alert!
5 RSV deaths on this update. There is now 7 total deaths for RSV in VAERS. The RSV depop jab more than doubled their total report count with these 724 new reports. RSV total report count is now 1,356.
The zoster and flu vax with deaths in 2011 and 2020 along with the regular throttling they are doing with the covid depop jabs are ridiculous. Straight FRAUD.
However, however, however my personal favorite above and beyond of all the sinister tricks I’ve shown above is this report ID# 2663740 where the “Received Date” was manipulated!
The Received Date a.k.a. Entered Date, is the most sacred field of this entire VAERS system! It’s a computer time stamp that is populated 100% of time in VAERS and can not be manipulated by the submitter regardless of method or mode of entry into the system. Neither online, pdf upload, fax, or call-in. I have experience with Fax OCR to .dba conversion experience and it can be very automated. If a phone rep is manually entering the data, I’m sure it’s still in a online fashion.
I said this a hundred times, they are receiving reports of all kinds like death reports, sitting on them for many months and even now for a couple of years, then manipulating the “received date” to make it look like the submitter is the one delaying the submission? Why VAERS shit the bed and left their finger prints here on such a insignificant report like this is crazy, they can’t even properly scam the world correctly! Sad fact, ~40% of all death reports published in 2023, already died in 2021.
BTW, they didn’t even need to change the received date but they did. The actual expiration date on lot# 026B21A is 9/17/2021
I know what happened! Since they extend out every expiration date usually by 60 day increments at least once or twice, nurse Ratchett probably noticed the vial was technically expired by May 25, but was extended shortly before/after they submitted the report? Not to worry, the VAERS clean-up crew is always on the look out to polish up VAERS in favor of manufacturer.
VAERS was also caught this week trying to hide trial victims!
Can you see all the abnormal diagnostic tests that are abnormal? Can you see how NO event level is marked off? This report is technically buried in the “None of Above”, not serious, safe & effective bucket! Do you see how they retroactively deleted the info about this being a “trial” patient? No worries, This guy was already on my radar with a depop vax date of 9/1/2020. Calling Brook Jackson!!!! Don’t worry, I already did…
God Bless!! Please support The Eagle, pretty please, me hungry! Thanks for all who do I even another supporter, you know who you are! God Bless
You are to be congratulated for your relentless attention to those who are cheating. There aren’t any reasons why systematic cheating would occur, except attempts to hide AEs including deaths post-injection. If the incoming data did not incriminate the products, nobody at VAERS would do a thing.
Interestingly, the statement that “deaths after covid19 vaccination are rare”, followed by a tiny-looking % (presumably deaths vs injections given), if adjusted for what’s known as the *under reporting factor (only a fraction of adverse effects are ever formally reported) are very close to the 0.2% death rate demonstrated by Dr Denis Rancourt & colleagues.
(*I’ve used a URF of 30, though it may be a little higher or lower, to make this point).
Thank you!