VAERS Foreign reports (deaths) C19 historical look back

"The Vegas card tricks!"

Right off the bat the five drops in particular that happened between Jun4 - Jul19 looks very suspicious, it begs questions about which country they came from, and when were the victims vaccinated and when did they die? Nobody else in the world can give you better visibility and a recount of what happened than the one man show bear that is vaersaware.com so let’s get to it. This next image answers the “who” question:

So Germany and France, followed by Japan and GB being the major players. Staying on these 5,436 deaths, lets see when they were vaccinated?:

Ok so I’m not sure of the uptake stats for Germany, France or all countries involved, but it seems like most countries are in lockstep producing uptake statistics and proportions. The weekends from Apr1 to Apr8 was the big spike in the USA so I’ll assume it was the same around the world just so I can have a point of reference. One big disclaimer that needs to made about vax date, when there is NO vax date published I revert to the next best date strategy to populate the empty field. Onset, death, received date in that order is the methodology I follow. Having this insight I’ll ask myself what happened around July 1st in the image above? Why does that finger of about ~40 deaths pop-up? What’s up on the other end at around Jan 1st? In the CDC vax uptake tracker there is a crescendo leading up to a “spike” every Friday. Sundays are always the lowest “uptake” days each and every week. I notice the cadence and shape of the vax date graph created from VAERS follows the same pattern with one additional exception and layer of complexity. After reading thousands of reports I realized a common practice healthcare workers use filing reports, and I’m sure within their own charting or SOAP notes, is to use the 1st of the month as the populated date when they are uncertain about the exact date? Jan1, Feb1, Mar1 will be used when they know the month but are unsure of the exact date within that month as an example. This is actually a common practice for all the various dates like vax, onset, and death. It’s very apparent that’s what is going on when HCW’s enter vax date of Jan13, but a onset date of Jan1st as an example. Most of the time the ambiguity is expressed in the summary narrative when actually reading reports. In deeper knowledge it’s what I was previously familiar with and with the proliferation of electronic medical records where date fields need to be populated. The other detail that needs to be mentioned is that the VAERS form itself allows the submitter to enter in only a month/year format like this example straight from the submitter form:

It also needs to be mentioned and pondered, the Today’s date field is locked in and can NOT be altered or deleted by the submitter, yet the “received” date on CDC’s end can and has been altered! No field is sacred in VAERS, however the Received Date, aka Entered Date should be.

Here is the Death Date (week) of the 5,436 foreign deaths:

Here is the very important Day Lag delay between when VAERS received the report and when the report was published:

This last image below is courtesy of vaersanalysis.info and representation of DEATHS in terms of a % between territories aka Domestic vs Foreign, by published (drop) date.

A last little factoid for you to ponder, did you know that currently ~8.5% or ~130K of 1.55M reports DO NOT HAVE a vax date? An astonishing almost ~15% Deaths or ~5K death reports DO NOT HAVE a vax date. Not to be confused with the ~21% of death reports or 7,400 that DO NOT HAVE a death date! The arrow is pointing in the wrong direction as people like to say, on the very reports VAERS is entrusted to be extra diligent about. Well not in my neck of the woods because I’ve beat down this ~7,400 to ~4,126 and explained in my last article.:

I’ve found over ~350K UNKNOWN ages, I’ve cleaned up a couple hundred thousand lot#’s and added expiration dates, I’ve identified uncounted deaths, up-coded over a hundred thousands none serious adverse events to serious events, like finding deaths, cardiac arrests, myocarditis, stokes, pulmonary embolisms, fetal demises, etc in the lowest event level “None of Above”. I or you the general public can toggle between every single report that would be considered edited or “cleansed” versus what has been untouched. I in effect have fabricated a dashboard tool that helps me audit better, I have created a dashboard and website that is courtroom ready, and I have brought hard core analytics down into the hands of the general public for better full informed consent. What more can one man do with the limited resources I have? If I were a Kirsch type, even a Bobbie Kennedy or Del BigTree type, heck even a McCullough type, I’d stop monkeying around and put together the best VAERS dashboard and website the world has ever seen! I consider my dashboards and website a beta version and just a example of what can been done. I know what needs to be done and where all the pieces are. If you’re following me then you’ve heard me say you are witnessing a evolution of what “VAERS” will be one day in terms of visibility and accountability. The peer reviewed static black and white graphs are going out of style like Charlie Chaplin. We are in 4K “talkie” moving pictures now. You use a dashboard everyday of your life and you don’t even realize it, it’s called your cellphone. You are surely using something on your mobile phone that is using Tableau as part of it’s backbone, Otherwise Salesforce wouldn’t have purchased Tableau for $15B in 2019. I’m surprised the buzzards at Saleforce and Blackrock let anybody analyze VAERS using Tableau. Please consider throwing some coffee, muffins or donations my way. God Bless