Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Joy Lucette Garner's avatar

And this study shows that because of the way they've set the system up, VAERS only receives reports from "less than 1%" of the ACTUAL real-world injuries that occur shortly after vaccination. SEE: https://digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/electronic-support-public-health-vaccine-adverse-event-reporting-system

This study has never been refuted, and no improvements to the system were ever made. The only substantive change made, was that the CDC ordered hospitals to falsely classify recently-vaccinated people (less than 2 weeks since their SECOND jab) as "unvaccinated" so that when they show up at hospitals dying (or already dead) immediately after a jab, there would be almost no chance it COULD be reported as a "vaccine injury."

And there is no system in place even PRETENDING to track the long-term injuries.

Based upon he Harvard-Pilgrim study of the VAERS reporting rate, we must FIRST take the VAERS numbers and multiply them by AT LEAST 100. Only after this can we begin to factor in all of the OTHER presumed under-reporting factors which must be added to the calibration.

It comes down to a multiplication factor of close to 1,000 times the injuries that VAERS does report. VAERS exists ONLY to launder the maimed and dead bodies so that the $$$ made off of them won't need to be laundered.

Expand full comment
Zana Carver, Ph.D.'s avatar

Well done, Albert! You do such amazing work and I love your down to earth writing:)

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts