P8 BOMBSHELL!: New Zealand Data - VAERS Is Running Cover For NZ MOH!
Running Cover! 41% of all NZ C19 reports just published Dec 1, 2023
Part 7 HERE : NZ DASHBOARD
MAIN DASHBOARD
Folks this is amazing! VAERS published new monthly data on Friday Dec 1st, 2023 in which they published 2,834 Covid-19 reports from New Zealand. 2,835 if you want count this zoster de-pop shot:
Here is the Eagle eye’s summary of New Zealand’s new data for Dec 1st only:
On quick sniff, I say it’s practically all low level safe & effective adverse events, if you pass out upon injection it must be working! Also all the jab dates seem very old but supposedly VAERS received and published the reports within a very reasonable 36 days at most? Well that’s what you would be led to believe and that’s what the data says at face value, but let’s keep digging and see what kinds of symptoms were reported for C19 reports only. Oh yeah, NZ & Pfizer doesn’t send any lot# info, that’s Pfizer running cover for themselves…
It’s difficult to squeeze every symptom into image, but you can see ~2,800 reports generated over ~14K symptoms, or about 5 symptoms per report. It’s pretty unusual, and basically I never seen syncope come in at #1 with this many reports unless it’s something that VAERS or NZ has curated? Beware there are three forces at work here, the MOH, Pfizer, and VAERS as these reports travel into the public domain. It is my opinion VAERS had these reports in their possession for far longer than they claim, but when Barry The Whistleblower dropped dime on NZ MOH the three gargoyle minions (VAERS, manufacturer, MOH) went into damage control and needed to begin to get some data into VAERS quickly so they don’t look stupid. The outside world other than the Eagle’s followers will never know that 41% of NZ’s reports were just published, as no published date time stamp officially exists on reports. It’s only a Medalerts.org Wayback machine thing where a person can see the appears date (add 7 days for when it’s actually published).
Moreover there are many reports basically under-coded! Do you see the Myocarditis, Bell’s Palsy, Brady & Tachycardia they are basically calling “NONE OF ABOVE” aka not serious aka safe & effective? Hold on, let me refine the dashboard a little…
You see this folks, I just plucked out some low hanging under-coded fruit. Look at what they are calling not serious, simply because a box is not checked off that the victim landed in the ER or spent a night in the hospital? You would think a heart attack would be considered a life threatening event? Let’s take a look…
Wow this last one is a 28yr old non serious heart attack? Not recovered? I wonder if this lady is even still alive today? Only initial reports are made public don’t forget! Maybe down the road somebody will match up VAERS reports to Barry’s real data?
Let this quick hit observation make notice that throttling and under-coding goes on like crazy all over the place! It’s my belief based on constant auditing, VAERS must be unethically obfuscating data, by scrubbing ages, changing received dates, unchecking event level boxes, then curating what to publish based to symptoms, and everything else. Maybe this is what General Dynamics does for VAERS? GDIT or some AI algorithm helps with the curation and manipulation? Maybe VAERS uses the Python Probability Buckets algorithms for nefarious purposes, which Steve Kirsch uses Python algorithms for ethical purposes?
I wonder what Jessica Rose or Liz Wilner of OpenVAERS thinks? Surely they have an opinion? Don’t worry peeps, I got my own friends in NZ fighting the good fight! The right people already know about this or will know shortly. The rest of you are the lucky ones with a front row seat. God Bless.
The Dashboard is ready! High & Tight & On Point!
The Money shot for my Kiwis:
There were rumors a few days ago that fizzer had dropped a load of NZ adverse reactions from 2021 onto the Vaers system. Can you find any fatalities, because our government only admits to 4 deaths attributed to the jabs. Ludicrous isn't it.
Great stuff, they could be hiding the worst ones somewhere. 71% of Pfizer injury reports were marked as serious in UK although the agency is trying to explain them away!!