Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jeanne's avatar

These records would benefit from meeting Part 11 compliant cGMP e-records & e-signature requirements or similar.

One of those requirements is:

Use of secure, computer-generated, time-stamped audit trails to independently record the date and time of operator entries and actions that create, modify, or delete electronic records. Record changes shall not obscure previously recorded information. Such audit trail documentation shall be retained for a period at least as long as that required for the subject electronic records and shall be available for agency review and copying.

https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-A/part-11

Expand full comment
David Pare's avatar

My contribution: have a VAERS status page that shows how many entries are in what state. Basically, make "throttling" absolutely detectible in real time for everyone. Roughly enumerate all entries that are "pending" for longer than six weeks, grouped by date of entry.

Basically - all the frauds you have seen and charted - make it part of the system to automatically chart these frauds, presenting them to the world in real time.

"So how come you VAERS has 100,000 entries pending since 2005?"

Same thing with deleted records. Chronicle them too.

Then get DOGE to run an AI analysis to look for bad patterns and outcomes every year or so.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts