New Zealand's Whistleblower Dashboard Part 2
"How To" video
Moving fast, so here is the “How To” Video.
Download the files: send me a email
So many people have asked for my comments on Igor Chudov’s substack article and what I thought about it, Barry the whistleblower even asked if I read it and said it was fair…
Yes it’s fair and Igor is probably a great SQL guy, but I also know SQL is like chess because there are players and there are Grandmasters. So goes SQL. The other thing I can tell about Igor is that he probably hasn’t spent very much time in the VAERS database, even though this data set isn’t about adverse events except for death. With that there are couple things I will point out that didn’t really make much sense in Igor’s article?
Do the missing records of first vaccinations (doses 1-2) hide real vaccine deaths, making Liz Gunn go on about “deadly nursing homes” instead of looking at deaths actually caused by the COVID vaccine?
There are many reports including deaths where only the 3rd, 4th, or 5th dose is recorded but not the previous ones. Since a death can not happen on a previous dose, this wouldn’t be a cogent statement. Here is something to be said for DOSE 1 reports, however. Many reports here in this data set just like VAERS has a dose “unit” or dose “series” discrepancy. When you read VAERS reports submitters will report one line item with dose/unit 1, however reading the report they are actually talking about their 3, 4, 5 dose, booster, etc. I just recently explained this conundrum here:
Expert Level Critique About VAERS Dosing Analysis
There is a big difference between a “dose series” versus “dose units” which means a pretty dynamic algorithm script needs to be created and applied to properly calculate the doses administered for each report. Here is the general absolute counts of doses administered:
The overall arching question about this data set is “is this a complete set?”. I wonder if 4 million Kiwis were really vaxxed? The CDC, big pharma, and governments lie about everything and I’m to believe them now when they supposedly tell us how many people vax been fully vaxxed, partially vaxxed, etc? It makes more sense this is one huge money laundering scheme and they need to keep faking the numbers to justify the massive purchase of de-pop shots!
Igor makes a point about SNF’s, Palliative Care facilities, or old people on their way out anyways, and backgrounds deaths and whatever…
I will say, sure there might be gaps in the data but bottom line is there are 37K deaths in this data. The atrocity must be massive. The Professor Peabody's want to talk about SNF, palliative care, old people and P values, but if you rob somebody of one day of life, it's still murder. God Bless Barry The Whistleblower & Liz Gunn.
looking forward to your reply to Igor!
Hi, wonderful representation of the data. During the mandate, there were people who you could pay $100 NZD to receive the jab on your behalf so they could keep their job. To keep our job we had to prove our VAX status to the ministry, you were given a number that could be matched against the data base. So the reason this person may have "29 jabs" is because he/she went and got 29 jabs on behalf of 29 people... I honestly do not know if or how they are still standing. This may or may not contribute to the skew in rouge data.