Dr. Jessica Rose asks for a finer tooth comb in recent VAERS "Buckhaults" analysis...
A ongoing look into McKernan/Buckhaults Lot analysis.
Here is Dr. Rose’s recent article published today Aug 9th. HERE.
Please be aware this is the first real test of the VaersAware new MEGA DASHBOARD. Oh goody gum drops!
Here’s Jessica’s blurb that caught me eye:
Here is the brass tacks:
Initial Declarations:
Column E aka Doses shipped is from ICAN’s Pfizer FOIA, source HERE.
Dr. Rose is including ER as a SAE, so I will too for this analysis
Unknown doses shipped for Moderna are not included ICAN’s Moderna FOIA, presumably because the were to new, source HERE.
Working Observations:
Q) Jessica and VaersAware (VA) are using the VAERS data up to and including new data dropped on August 4th, why does VA have considerably more total adverse events than Dr. Rose?
A) Elementary my dear Watson, because VA ethically cleanses lot#’s. Let’s use Buckhault’s lot EL9264 as the example:
As for Jessica’s 75 deaths on EL9264? Jessica may want to check her code in SQL or “R”?… Sorry Jessica.
So the original Rose question and the fine tooth comb thing is actually easier than than cycle thresholds and p-values I think? We here as vaersaware think it’s because Buckhault’s lot were much older as per their expiration dates. As for the ages of these 103 deaths attributed to lot# EL9264, here ya go:
Here is VaersAware’s version of Jessica’s graph EL9264:
A side note, I do not put to much credence into %SAE’s relative to total case counts without doing a some ethical up-coding first. A block of administration errors can skew your analysis along with all the fetal demise, cardiac arrests, pulmonary emboli, and other SAE’s that reside in the lowest level AE “None of Above”. I won’t bother to demonstrate how much pure administration errors have affected this over all analysis, it’s not much and it only affects the %SAE calculations.
I still believe in “hot lots” and more specifically, hot vials within lots. This evil cabal is probably to sophisticated to tamper with an entire lot#, but they are plenty savvy to tamper with vials, especially when they don’t need to follow any rules and/or just invent the rules as they go along.
Here at VaersAware we believe in not just doing a job, but doing a job well! We try to learn as much as we can, and what we don’t know we just make it up. Just kidding. All data here is true and honest and sincere and authentic. The truth will defend itself. God Bless. Support The Eagle! Rev 8:13
As I commented on Jessica's article:
Endotoxin attaches itself to dsDNA
The fact that Serious Adverse Event rates don't correlate with dsDNA points to variability likely to be found if anyone holding donated jab samples sent them for Mass Spec analysis.
Brain Bleed from Janssen is likely due to Polysorbate 80 and/or the Adenovirus carrier.
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/polysorbate-80-in-covid19-jabs-a