Don't mean to beat a dead horse on the "Denmark Study"....but
Don't mean to beat a dead horse on the "Denmark Study"....but
Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine by Max Schmeling, Vibeke Manniche, Peter Riis Hansen
This makes my third comment on the subject, you can follow the previous thread here.
The conclusion I made is basically the paper was a very noble and worthy study at the time and for the snapshot of VAERS the authors were examining. However, in hindsight now today, the paper is antiquated and if anything highlights the purposeful delay VAERS uses to publish reports, aka THROTTLING! The bottom line is the list of lot numbers they were calling “placebos” are basically far from it. For the record, I do believe “placebo” vials exist. I do not doubt there are “placebo” vials or placebo lots reserved for the gestapos and lieutenants of the cabal. Moreover, I have lists of Moderna and Pfizer lots that have even EXPIRED, yet there are ZERO reports in VAERS. Hear me well, I have a list of at least 50 expired Moderna lots with ZERO reports in VAERS! Let’s just say I also have high people in low places, and high people in low places.
Ok so now let’s beat that dead horse one last time. In VAERS new data drop a few days back on Friday July 7, 2023, there were still “Blue, Green, Yellow” lot# reports from the Denmark study still being published as new reports! See here:
A couple observations, let’s look at the one death on lot# FE2090:
So yeah if this paper was good for anything, it was great in exposing the severe amount of throttling that is going on right now! I don’t even want to take another swipe at this dead horse and look at all the blue, green, yellow lots that have been now funneled into UNKOWN FOREIGN COUNTRY because of the arbitrary scrubbing of foreign data. How many of those were from Denmark?
Here’s the list of those ~38 reports just published by VAERS, enjoy the dashboard!
Please consider a paid subscription to keep the Eagle flying high. God Bless.
Let me see if I understand your point Albert. Keep kicking that horse!! Is it:
As of Friday July 7, 2023, there were still “Blue, Green, Yellow” lot number reports, the one's referenced in the Denmark study, that have only just recently been published by the CDC and appear as "new reports" in VAERS. These infact are "delayed to be published" reports (throttled) not "new" in so much as a recent adverse event, they are old adverse events that the public is only now becoming aware of. The Denmark study cut off on January 11, 2022, but since this time new reports continue to trickle in, which their adverse event date falls within the assessment time frame of Denmark study. Add to this these “Blue, Green, Yellow” lot numbers expired long ago, as such the "new" VAERS reports can't be for a recent vaccination.
(Curious, how many more reports have dropped on top of the 411 out of interest?)
So. Are you saying the Denmark study is "antiquated" because they are drawing conclusions from a snap-shot in time and not all the possible data? But in truth they can't get all the data, because more relavent reports have since dropped, continue to drop and there is no way of knowing how much more is to come? But also in the "yellow dot" lot numbers you've seen adverse events with suggests those batches definitely are not placebo.
Am I understanding you correctly.
But in general, if I am reading your work correctly, you've witnessed that the publishing of VAERS reports is so corrupt with delays, missed fields, hidden data (in text fields and not check boxes), etc, that no conclusions can be drawn except to say the CDC is tampering with data in many ways?
I remember Deborah Conrad, in her interview with The Highwire, explaining the complexity of filling in a VAERS report. It seems impossible that someone could submit a report without filling in all fields and checking boxes, especially the simple thing of capturing the age of the person. It is highly sketchy to believe so many "unknown age" fields to be submitted.
https://totalityofevidence.com/deborah-conrad-vaers-whistleblower/