Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John Beaudoin Sr The Real CdC's avatar

I have maintained from the beginning that this is not a matter of sending killer lots to red states, but rather simply it is reporter bias where red states have more honest people and culture to report truth of the injuries and deaths.

New Hampshire being listed as a blue state is far from reality. They're half and half. And when you look at the bottom of the article and see the most vaxed states, 5 out of 6 New England states occupy the top 5 spots, New Hampshire being the only one not even in the top 10.

Yet New Hampshire is high on the list of reported deaths.

MA, ME, VT, CT, RI doctors and hospital employees know that it is career-ending to be caught reporting to VAERS.

I find it strange but not strange that MN, WI, and MI are in the 6, 7, and 8 spots, respectively. Strange because they are blue states. But not strange because they're all next to each other and the culture of the midwest might lend itself to honesty over cultism.

I wonder if anyone looked at a weighting system of combining reports per population versus vax uptake.

Given that 4 New England states are 35, 39, 43, 56 and are the top 4 in being vaxed and that the tops states in death in VAERS might be a least vx'd populations, then that's not an indication that the vax words, but rather an indication that the reporting is biased based on the local cultures.

Albert, if you see this, we can write this up.

Expand full comment
David Pare's avatar

Do we have an estimate as to how many disinformation-reports there are as a percentage of valid and published reports? UNKNOWN and mis-spellings and bad ages and throttled reports not-yet-published? Basically - how bad is this problem?

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts