Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Aravind Mohanoor's avatar

In case you missed it, this is from a Substack article by Dr Meryl Nass:

"Which leads us to AstraZeneca and Senofi’s new monoclonal antibody shot, nirsevimab, for newborn babies.

....

But right off the bat, the company’s own trial shows more all-cause deaths during a 12-month observational period in the trial group than in the placebo group: 12 babies died in the trial group compared to four in the placebo! According to the FDA, the number of deaths in all the trials put together "exceeds what one would expect with the 2:1 randomization in Trials 03, 04, and 05." Relative to the size of each arm, there was roughly a 50% higher death rate in the trial arm. Yet the manufacturer and government officials automatically are assuming that every one of them died of natural causes.

....

Moreover, why is a monoclonal antibody, which is a therapeutic, being treated as a vaccine, even though it cannot stop infection? Well, of course, the companies treat it like a vaccine so they can place it on the child immunization schedule and enjoy the liability shield from all harm! At the same time, they are treating it like a drug in the sense that it will not be on VAERS reporting!"

https://merylnass.substack.com/p/horowitz-cdc-committee-shockingly

Expand full comment
Michelle's avatar

Query: The first listing in the chart has a death date of 1/1/90 and a vaxed date of 2/2/2024 ? There has got to be something wrong there. Clerical error? Could this be an example of some sort of fraud?

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts