Bombshell: CDC (VAERS) Just Scammed ICAN/Siri With The New "Hot Lot" Tranche?

Tons of Goofiness, insincerity, ambiguity and a couple hurt egos all around. (Part 3)

Click to launch ICAN article

Click to launch Highwire’s Bitchute channel/video aired Jan 11.

My previous article (Part 2):

I put forth most of the facts above. Now the timeline so far. ICAN releases their internet Legal Update on Monday Jan 8th, followed up by the Highwire’s video piece on Thursday the 11th.

OpenVAERS (Liz) also released their announcement on Jan 8th:

Click to launch tweet

click to launch tweet

Defamatory? Hmmm that can’t be me, I’ve only told the truth and gave a apology. Sorry Liz for the misunderstanding, still doesn’t make your visuals desirable in my selective perception. I’ll say the same thing, you know how to get a hold of me. I don’t do passive aggressive or sheepish well. Funny how people don’t exist until they do.

My mia culpa here is that within an hour of original Liz tweet, I responded with the “sorry folks…” comment because I still had not understood the distinction of Liz’s “per million dose” data smoothing and correlations. With a little help from friends I reconciled the visuals and correlations in my head, and it prompted my 2nd article or my “Half hearted apology” immediately the next day on Jan 9th.

I know when dealing with huge numbers and many zeros it looks cleaner on graphs and print to normalize the numbers by chopping off three or even six zeros so the tick marks on graphs aren’t so cluttered. Sometimes it’s even good because it correlates the relative spacing/length between histogram bars like in OpenVAERS analysis here:

What’s not so desirable is to give the appearance lot 032H20A has almost 450 deaths when it officially has 45 deaths with total doses shipped at 98,000. 032H20A still happens to be the most toxic lot in the VAERS universe, so what is this 052D22A all about?

Here is lot 052D22A and 032H20A side by side and in this reality :

If I put a gun to your head, which jab would you rather have? The math salad shoots 052D22A up to the top of the SAE’s list because of Hospitalizations & Emergency and only 25,000 doses shipped. Here is another thing that is a bit of a game changer, in Liz’s world she classifies a ER Doctor/Room as a SAE (Serious), when by CDC’s definition it is not considered a SAE. I do agree in principal with Liz that the CDC should generally classify ER level as a serious event especially because this pharmacovigilance slant should be all about safety, not hiding injuries. Would have been nice to give folks a little (more) clarification. If someone is using Medalerts.org or CDC’s own WONDER system as an example, they will not be able to correlate to OpenVAERS own SAE stats. Moreover shouldn’t there be a weighted relative unit with more value assigned to a death as opposed to a hospitalization or an emergency? I guess that’s why a person needs to look at all the graphs and from all angles to get perspective. My toxic lot RVU (relative value) view is what helps me zero in toxic lots quickly. Maybe something like this will happen in OpenVAERS 2.0

Here’s a point you won’t readily hear from a computational biologist or general analysts because they are not in the “business” of medicine like I am. ER doctor and ER Room VAERS event level is a philosophical debate in my head because we know very few private GP’s & physicians accept straight Medicaid. Medicaid patients, uninsured and working uninsured patients usually need to go to their county hospital and fill up ER rooms for sniffles, colds, aches and pains and even Rx refills. I do see a small segment of VAERS “ER” reports that might fit the description of low level stuff and maybe not typical of what a layman might consider emergency, but it’s seriously offset by the amount of truly serious reports in the lowest level None Of Above AE. Either way we are screwed without the ability to ethically up-code all the stuff CDC/VAERS is trying to hide. Instead I’m over here getting some of the dump & pumpers butt hurt, pointing out nobody is ethically cleansing data, up-coding events or debating the pros and cons of normalizing numbers?

Here is a word to the wise and declaration:

VAERSAWARE codes event levels to ultimate specificity only, we DO NOT DOUBLE COUNT EVENT LEVELS.

Do you see how lot 052D22A has 239 total events for 186 cases (people) or 128% more events than cases? The dead female here is marked as a death and hospitalization just to highlight my point. My uncle who had a stroke and now permanently disabled, had a life threatening event, landed in the ER, immediate surgery, admitted as an inpatient for two weeks, then transferred to a rehab for another two weeks. My uncle is counted as four SAE’s in Liz’s world (ER, Hosp, Life threat, Perm Disability).

Let me show you how messy this double counting gets:

Pay close attention, these are all covid and booster depop shots spooled now Jan 13. ~1.6M people produces ~1.8M event levels. But But Butt, NONE OF ABOVE event level can never be double counted, it exists because in ~64% of all reports not one event level box is checked off! In effect the remaining ~570K people (cases) are producing the remaining ~758K events. Folks I’m showing you a fact that ~33% of the data we are analyzing can be double counted without coding events to ultimate specificity. The more severe the report, the higher propensity for that report is to be triple and quadruple counted.

Yikes! Well add that to the pile of vulnerabilities in the data, it’s not OpenVAERS fault it’s the evil genius way the cabal designed the system when they knew full well VAERS would be used to run cover on vaccine injuries from day one.

I didn’t really endear myself to Craig Paardekooper either a few years ago when all the “hot lot” folks were arm wrestling about this stuff back then either. But Craig and I did sharpen iron and I think I gained his respect. He still has my vaersaware link on his website and I have his on mine. Welcome to the party Liz, the water is warm most of the time.

---

CDC Scamming ICAN & we the people:

First the good, there were 230 Moderna lots included in ICAN last tranche in July 2023 where the “doses shipped count” increased by a total on ~27.5M doses:

* side thought is CDC arbitrarily inflating the doses shipped? Why have the doses shipped not been locked in by now especially for the very oldest lots? Even the oldest lots got a bump which just dilutes the toxic lots…

Just showing ~32 lots with greatest increase

Now the bad, there were 50 Moderna lots where the “doses shipped” actually decreased for a total counted of ~-33.7M doses!

The net effect of 281 lots that were in July 2023 tranche is ~ -6.1M less doses. Actually this loss means that the toxic lot relative value will increase.

The good, there were 39 Moderna lots (23.2M doses) new to the world and not in the last tranche.

The bad, there were 29 old Moderna lots for ~29.7M doses not in this new tranche, but in last tranche. I guess we’ll count them as if they were when I start making dashboards.

The bad, there are still 15 lots given in July 2023 tranche, but still has zero (0) reports in VAERS, except one report… This is what I call the money laundering, 10% for the big guy….

If anybody finds a correction, has some insight, or a rebuttal, or even a grievance, let’s hear it, or even better let’s see it! For those that don’t know I made a couple cool interactive dashboards based on the last tranche. I’m not feeling the love, so I’ll probably draft a bit and see what other folks produce, before I take it to the next level.

HERE and HERE

God Bless. Please support The Eagle!