ALERT! VAERS Deletes Dead Pfizer Trial Victims!
Gets rid of the evidence like crash test dummies
Dar she blows!
I spoke about this poor soul recently and said I also put in a FOIA for the information over this past weekend. Well here it is!:
HHS then sent a second email aka a Amendment for more info:
Can you believe this bullshit? HHS is acting as if I want HIPPA info about my relative or something? I just want to know why the report was DELETED? If it was deleted because it was a duplicate and what is the VAERS ID# of the live published twin report, if so? If it was a fake or false report, where did it come from? Did the submitter go to jail for committing a felony? How did this report also slip through Pfizer’s guard and was allowed to be cross-walked into VAERS? This report was not submitted by some foolio off the street as per the data field: CDC Split_Type. This report came from Pfizer.
I AM NOW ASKING FOR YOUR HELP!
I need ICAN, Del, Aaron Siri, CHD, Robert F. Kennedy Jr, Dr. Brian Hooker, etc. I need the Florida’s AG Ashley Moody, I need Ashley’s Dad James Moody and her brother James Jr.. and Dr. Joseph Ladapo! Yo my man Ron (DeSantis) can you help a brother out? We need to find the death cert and obituary of this poor victim. I’m calling in all my favors on this one!
To the general public especially the peeps in Florida, if you can ask around and search your local funeral service homes we need to find this dead lady, she died April 21, 2021 somewhere in Florida. We need as many people as possible to go on legacy.com hunt for this lady’s obituary. Time is of the essence, God Bless! Support The Eagle.
Everybody who reads this should at least share it and pay it forward.
Since I’m getting very little help, I’ll just do it myself…
My calculation, after reading their "final report" and then digging to find the TRUTH, was that they murdered AT LEAST 10K (or 11% of the people who took their jabs in the experiment) during the trials. All of these were later "excluded" from being a "participant" EVEN THOUGH they'd been jabbed at least once. So because they were no longer considered to be "participants" they were never even MENTIONED in the final report. Instead, they said "Of the PARTICIPANTS (rather than "of everyone who took the shot") only 0.87% were excluded."
So there's your word salad. Since they decided to exclude them (after they DIED) they were no longer considered to be "participants" and therefore didn't need to be mentioned in the full/final report. It took me many hours of digging to locate their REAL exclusion list, i.e., the people who were no longer counted as "participants" but who DID get jabbed and then either DIED, or where so sick they REFUSED to take another jab.
They hid this document amongst thousands of mislabeled PDFs. I've linked to the specific document on my feed covering this issue.
So would this be an estimated variable added after an under-reporting factor (URF) is applied? If so, how may that estimated variable be added when number of deaths, life-threatening, permanent disability, or other serious events vary? Is there an estimated factor to be used on number of reports deleted, that indicates the difference between deleted unnecessarily vs. for a good legitimate reason?