Alert! Is VAERS cleaning up Minnesota DEATHS now? July 7, 2023
Is CDC trying to clean-up the evidence for some reason? Someone get Scott Jensen!
In the most recent VAERS data update a few days ago, there was an fairly large anomaly that largely goes unnoticed by most, but not by me….
Every so often and mostly rare, VAERS goes into already published reports and “updates” data elements within reports. Many times they update summary narratives to de-identify data, they also in effect up-code and down code reports with respects to event levels.
The situation we are discussing here is retro-actively up-coding a already published report to DEATH! In https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/wayback/index.php it looks like this:
The changes to “Died” from this weeks summary list can go in either direction, like adding a “YES” to the died field or deleting the “YES”. More often than not they are upcoding reports to death, and usually because the narrative clearly indicates the victim has expired, passed away, is now dead. Before you think they are doing a good job and doing us a favor by ethically cleaning up these oversights, just know there is at least 50 other C19 victims clearly DEAD, but VAERS has not gone in and updated the died field to “YES”.
There were many odd patterns in this weeks death “up-codes”.
There were 12 of them which is unusually rare, when they do up-code it’s just one or two at a time.
8 death up-codes were from Minnesota, 2 from Washington state, 1 from Wisconsin, and 1 from state UNKNOWN.
There was a 13th death report that was actually officially PREVIOUSLY DELETED on October 29, 2021 but brought back as a “new” report on this drop Jul 7, 2023.
Let’s work backwards and start with the DELETED DEATH from the Netherlands, but has now re-appeared… dar she blows!:
Now let’s get to those Minnesota DEATHS. I have to say they are interesting because according to their new DEATH DATE, they look to have died after the initial submission of report? Like this example:
The other 7 Minnesota up-code death reports are as follows:
ID# 2042824, ID# 2042866, ID# 2043098, ID# 2311601, ID# 2313011, ID# 2313051, ID# 2318872.
A submission date (aka Entered date) that precedes a death date sticks out like a sore thumb in my dashboard here:
Conclusion:
I wonder if this Minnesota clean-up job has anything to do with this article?:
Or maybe it has something to do with this research?
Hmmmm. God Bless.
Question? the case cited indicates a vaccine damage registered jan-22. The update from CDC is i8-22, 7 months later. What is the significance? The person was not listed as dead in January but suffered vaccine damage. Very typical--yes? Then he died with apparent kidney failure problems as he was on dialysis. Where is the aberration? Please explain.
Mind you I am not supporting the CDC which is a criminally based anti-science agency but I do want to understand accusation when they are made.