Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David Pare's avatar

My two cents based on the Mass General anaphylaxis study:

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2777417

16 anaphylaxis/52,805 dose 1 = 303/million.

303/million anaphylaxis rate from the survey of their workforce. CDC on their website alleged an anaphylaxis rate of 2-5/million.

That puts URF = 61-152x. Conservatively, that's 61x. In-the-middle, its around 106x.

Expand full comment
Devon Brewer's avatar

Thank you for this post. The bundling of multiple reports into one is concerning. The Janssen case is clear as is https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=1034985&WAYBACKHISTORY=ON.

But the others don't seem to be clear cases.

https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=1015614&WAYBACKHISTORY=ON: wording implies there is a separate report for each of the 19

https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=1518174&WAYBACKHISTORY=ON: wording implies there is a separate report for each of the 4

https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=1010689&WAYBACKHISTORY=ON: seems to be a single report/case

In a comment below, you (Eagle) cite this report as having bundled 3,000 deaths:

https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=50793&WAYBACKHISTORY=ON

When I go to that link, I see a single death. Did the links get messed up?

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts